Holtzman Tahl, Rajapaksa Thimali, Mostofi Abteen, Edgley Steve A
Department of Anatomy, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK.
J Physiol. 2006 Jul 15;574(Pt 2):491-507. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.108282. Epub 2006 May 18.
While the synaptic properties of Golgi cell-mediated inhibition of granule cells are well studied, less is known of the afferent inputs to Golgi cells so their role in information processing remains unclear. We investigated the responses of cerebellar cortical Golgi cells and Purkinje cells in Crus I and II of the posterior lobe cerebellar hemisphere to activation of peripheral afferents in vivo, using anaesthetized rats. Recordings were made from 70 Golgi cells and 76 Purkinje cells. Purkinje cells were identified by the presence of climbing fibre responses. Golgi cells were identified by both spontaneous firing pattern and response properties, and identification was confirmed using juxtacellular labelling of single neurones (n = 16). Purkinje cells in Crus II showed continuous firing at relatively high rates (25-60 Hz) and stimulation of peripheral afferents rarely evoked substantial responses. The most common response was a modest, long-latency, long-lasting increase in simple spike output. By comparison, the most common response evoked in Golgi cells by the same stimuli was a long-latency, long-lasting depression of firing, found in approximately 70% of the Golgi cells tested. The onsets of Golgi cell depressions had shorter latencies than the Purkinje cell excitations. Brief, short-latency excitations and reductions in firing were also evoked in some Golgi cells, and rarely in Purkinje cells, but in most cases long-lasting depressions were the only significant change in spike firing. Golgi cell responses could be evoked using air puff or tactile stimuli and under four different anaesthetic regimens. Long-lasting responses in both neurone types could be evoked from wide receptive fields, in many cases including distal afferents from all four limbs, as well as from trigeminal afferents. These Golgi cell responses are not consistent with the conventional feedback inhibition or 'gain control' models of Golgi cell function. They suggest instead that cerebellar cortical activity can be powerfully modulated by the general level of peripheral afferent activation from much of the body. On this basis, Golgi cells may act as a context-specific gate on transmission through the mossy fibre-granule cell pathway.
虽然对高尔基细胞介导的颗粒细胞抑制的突触特性已有充分研究,但对高尔基细胞的传入输入了解较少,因此它们在信息处理中的作用仍不清楚。我们使用麻醉大鼠,研究了小脑半球后叶 Crus I 和 II 中皮质高尔基细胞和浦肯野细胞对体内外周传入神经激活的反应。记录了 70 个高尔基细胞和 76 个浦肯野细胞的活动。通过存在攀爬纤维反应来识别浦肯野细胞。通过自发放电模式和反应特性来识别高尔基细胞,并使用单细胞的细胞旁标记(n = 16)进行确认。Crus II 中的浦肯野细胞以相对较高的频率(25 - 60 Hz)持续放电,外周传入神经的刺激很少引起明显反应。最常见的反应是简单锋电位输出适度、长潜伏期、持久的增加。相比之下,相同刺激在高尔基细胞中引发的最常见反应是长潜伏期、持久的放电抑制,在大约 70% 的测试高尔基细胞中出现。高尔基细胞抑制的起始潜伏期比浦肯野细胞兴奋的潜伏期短。一些高尔基细胞也会出现短暂、短潜伏期的兴奋和放电减少,而浦肯野细胞很少出现这种情况,但在大多数情况下,持久的抑制是锋电位发放中唯一显著的变化。使用吹气或触觉刺激以及在四种不同麻醉方案下都能诱发高尔基细胞反应。两种神经元类型的持久反应都可以从广泛的感受野诱发,在许多情况下包括来自四肢所有部位的远端传入神经以及三叉神经传入神经。这些高尔基细胞反应与高尔基细胞功能的传统反馈抑制或“增益控制”模型不一致。相反,它们表明小脑皮质活动可以受到来自身体大部分区域的外周传入神经激活的总体水平的强烈调节。在此基础上,高尔基细胞可能作为通过苔藓纤维 - 颗粒细胞通路传递的上下文特异性门控。