Forinder Ulla, Löf Catharina, Winiarski Jacek
Department of Paediatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pediatr Transplant. 2006 Jun;10(4):491-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2006.00507.x.
There is insufficient knowledge about the quality of life (QoL) among children after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). We recently reported an overall, good self-assessed QoL and health in 52 children who were three yr or more beyond SCT. The focus of this paper is the QoL as assessed by their parents, of whom 42 participated in the study. Using Swedish child health questionnaire (SCHQ)-PF50, parents rated their children's QoL lower on both the psychosocial (p<0.001) and physical summary scales (p<0.001) than the normative group of parents of children without chronic disease. Although essentially following each other, parent scores tended to be lower than children's own SCHQ-CF87 scores, particularly in the domains 'role socially due to physical limitations' (p<0.01) and 'self-esteem' (p<0.05). In the 'bodily pain' domain, patients' and parents' low scores agreed. The child's condition had a greater impact on parents' emotional situation than in the norm population (p<0.001). The severity of the child's physician-rated late effects (p<0.05) or of self-assessed subjective symptoms (p<0.01-0.05) was associated with a lower parental rating of the child's QoL. High Lansky or Karnofsky scores corresponded, respectively, to higher psychosocial (p<0.05) and physical (p<0.05) summary scores. It is concluded that as children, parents, and clinicians do not necessarily adopt similar views of a child's illness and of its impact on the child's life, clarity with regard to who is responsible for assessing the child's QoL is crucial when interpreting pediatric QoL studies.
对于异基因干细胞移植(SCT)后儿童的生活质量(QoL),我们了解不足。我们最近报告了52名SCT后三年或更长时间的儿童总体自我评估的良好生活质量和健康状况。本文的重点是由其父母评估的QoL,其中42位父母参与了研究。使用瑞典儿童健康问卷(SCHQ)-PF50,父母对孩子QoL的评分在心理社会(p<0.001)和身体综合量表(p<0.001)上均低于无慢性病儿童的父母规范组。尽管基本趋势一致,但父母的评分往往低于孩子自己的SCHQ-CF87评分,特别是在“因身体限制而社交角色”(p<0.01)和“自尊”(p<0.05)领域。在“身体疼痛”领域,患者和父母的低分一致。与正常人群相比,孩子的状况对父母情绪状况的影响更大(p<0.001)。医生评定的孩子晚期效应的严重程度(p<0.05)或自我评估的主观症状的严重程度(p<0.01 - 0.05)与父母对孩子QoL的较低评分相关。较高的兰斯基或卡诺夫斯基评分分别对应较高的心理社会(p<0.05)和身体(p<0.05)综合评分。结论是,由于儿童、父母和临床医生对儿童疾病及其对孩子生活的影响不一定有相似的看法,在解释儿科QoL研究时,明确谁负责评估孩子的QoL至关重要。