Koriat Asher, Ma'ayan Hilit, Sheffer Limor, Bjork Robert A
Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 May;32(3):595-608. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.595.
Judgments of learning (JOLs) underestimate the increase in recall that occurs with repeated study (the underconfidence-with-practice effect; UWP). The authors explore an account in terms of a foresight bias in which JOLs are inflated when the to-be-recalled target highlights aspects of the cue that are not transparent when the cue appears alone and the tendency of practice to alleviate bias by providing learners with cues pertinent to recall. In 3 experiments the UWP effect was strongest for items that induce a foresight bias, but delaying JOLs reduced the debiasing effects of practice, thereby moderating the UWP effect. This occurred when delayed JOLs were prompted by the cue alone (like during testing), not when prompted by the cue-target pair (like during study).
学习判断(JOLs)低估了重复学习后回忆的增加(实践中的过度自信效应;UWP)。作者探讨了一种前瞻性偏差的解释,即当待回忆的目标突出线索单独出现时不透明的线索方面时,JOLs会被夸大,以及实践通过为学习者提供与回忆相关的线索来减轻偏差的倾向。在3个实验中,UWP效应在引发前瞻性偏差的项目上最为强烈,但延迟JOLs会降低实践的去偏效应,从而调节UWP效应。当延迟的JOLs仅由线索提示时(如在测试期间)会出现这种情况,而当由线索-目标对提示时(如在学习期间)则不会。