Suppr超能文献

信心不足与练习效果中的年龄差异。

Age differences in the underconfidence-with-practice effect.

作者信息

Rast Philippe, Zimprich Daniel

机构信息

Gerontopsychology, Department of Psychology,University of Zurich, Binzmühlestrasse 14/24, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Exp Aging Res. 2009 Oct;35(4):400-31. doi: 10.1080/03610730903175782.

Abstract

In two verbal learning experiments, the authors examined the accuracy of memory monitoring and the underconfidence-with-practice (UWP) effect in younger and older adults. Memory monitoring was operationalized as judgements of learning (JOL). An open issue is whether UWP can also be found in older adults. In the first experiment, both younger and older adults overestimated their memory performance in the first trial, but the older group differed from the young group in the second trial. The JOLs given by older participants matched, on average, their recall performance. In fact, the UWP effect was not observed in any of several conditions in older participants. In the second experiment involving five study-test cycles and two age groups, the same basic pattern of results was present: Older adults did not show an UWP effect. These findings appear to fit into a framework of dual factors affecting JOLs, which posits that the magnitude of JOLs derives both from an anchoring point and from on-line monitoring of items.

摘要

在两项言语学习实验中,作者考察了年轻人和老年人记忆监测的准确性以及练习导致的信心不足(UWP)效应。记忆监测通过学习判断(JOL)来操作化。一个悬而未决的问题是UWP效应是否也会出现在老年人中。在第一个实验中,年轻人和老年人在第一次试验中都高估了自己的记忆表现,但老年组在第二次试验中与年轻组有所不同。老年参与者给出的JOL平均而言与他们的回忆表现相符。事实上,在老年参与者的几种条件下均未观察到UWP效应。在涉及五个学习-测试周期和两个年龄组的第二个实验中,出现了相同的基本结果模式:老年人没有表现出UWP效应。这些发现似乎符合影响JOL的双因素框架,该框架假定JOL的大小既来自一个锚定点,也来自对项目的在线监测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验