Serra Michael J, Dunlosky John
Department of Psychology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242-0001, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Nov;31(6):1258-66. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1258.
Judgments of learning (JOLs) made during multiple study-test trials underestimate increases in recall performance across those trials, an effect that has been dubbed the underconfidence-with-practice (UWP) effect. In 3 experiments, the authors examined the contribution of retrieval fluency to the UWP effect for immediate and delayed JOLs. The UWP effect was demonstrated with reliable underconfidence on Trial 2 occurring for both kinds of JOL. However, in contrast to a retrieval-fluency hypothesis, fine-grained analyses indicated that the reliance of JOLs on retrieval fluency contributed minimally to the UWP effect. Our discussion focuses on the status of the retrieval-fluency hypothesis for the UWP effect.
在多次学习 - 测试试验过程中做出的学习判断(JOLs)会低估这些试验中回忆表现的提升,这种效应被称为实践中信心不足(UWP)效应。在3项实验中,作者考察了提取流畅性对即时和延迟JOLs的UWP效应的作用。两种JOL在试验2中都出现了可靠的信心不足,从而证明了UWP效应。然而,与提取流畅性假设相反,细致的分析表明,JOLs对提取流畅性的依赖对UWP效应的贡献微乎其微。我们的讨论聚焦于UWP效应的提取流畅性假设的地位。