• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

(创伤性脑损伤后)能否开车?文献综述及其对康复和未来研究的启示

To drive or not to drive (after TBI)? A review of the literature and its implications for rehabilitation and future research.

作者信息

Tamietto Marco, Torrini Gaia, Adenzato Mauro, Pietrapiana Paolo, Rago Roberto, Perino Claudio

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Center for Cognitive Science, University of Torino, and Ausiliatrice Hospital, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi-ONLUS, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

NeuroRehabilitation. 2006;21(1):81-92.

PMID:16720941
Abstract

Development of reliable procedures to assess fitness to safe driving after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a crucial step in rehabilitation. However, prior studies are highly inconsistent in the choice of measures recommended for predicting driving fitness from different pre-driving measures. In the present paper the relevant literature is reviewed with the aim of shedding light on the reasons for these inconsistencies. The discrepant results reflect investigative choices which differ in five aspects: (1) the type of predictors used as pre-driving screening; (2) the type of measures considered as the criterion for the determination of fitness to drive after TBI; (3) the severity of the TBI in the sample of patients studied; (4) the extent of the neural structures damaged by TBI and the overlap of these areas with those involved in driving tasks; (5) the length of the follow-up considered. The strengths and weaknesses of the different methods and measures are discussed with their implications for future research and clinical rehabilitation. Encouraging findings come from recent studies that combined together medical, psychosocial, and personality measures, thereby improving the explanatory power of the predictors used. The use of post-injury driving fitness measures with great ecological and external validity seems equally promising in assessing actual driving in the real world.

摘要

制定可靠的程序以评估创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后安全驾驶的适宜性是康复过程中的关键一步。然而,先前的研究在推荐用于从不同驾驶前测量指标预测驾驶适宜性的测量方法选择上高度不一致。在本文中,对相关文献进行了综述,旨在阐明这些不一致的原因。结果的差异反映了在五个方面不同的研究选择:(1)用作驾驶前筛查的预测指标类型;(2)被视为TBI后确定驾驶适宜性标准的测量方法类型;(3)所研究患者样本中TBI的严重程度;(4)TBI损伤的神经结构范围以及这些区域与驾驶任务相关区域的重叠情况;(5)所考虑的随访时间长度。讨论了不同方法和测量指标的优缺点及其对未来研究和临床康复的影响。近期研究将医学、心理社会和人格测量指标结合起来,从而提高了所用预测指标的解释力,这些研究得出了令人鼓舞的结果。使用具有高度生态效度和外部效度的损伤后驾驶适宜性测量指标在评估现实世界中的实际驾驶情况方面似乎同样具有前景。

相似文献

1
To drive or not to drive (after TBI)? A review of the literature and its implications for rehabilitation and future research.(创伤性脑损伤后)能否开车?文献综述及其对康复和未来研究的启示
NeuroRehabilitation. 2006;21(1):81-92.
2
Driving and community integration after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后的驾驶与社区融入
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 May;89(5):922-30. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.01.009.
3
Is there a link between alertness and fatigue in patients with traumatic brain injury?创伤性脑损伤患者的警觉性与疲劳之间存在关联吗?
Neurology. 2008 Nov 11;71(20):1609-13. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000334753.49193.48.
4
The potential utility of driving simulators in the cognitive rehabilitation of combat-returnees with traumatic brain injury.驾驶模拟器在创伤性脑损伤退伍军人认知康复中的潜在效用。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009 Jan-Feb;24(1):51-6. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181956fe3.
5
Cognitive and personality determinants of post-injury driving fitness.受伤后驾驶能力的认知和人格决定因素。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010 Mar;25(2):99-117. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acp109. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
6
Acquired brain damage and driving: a review.后天性脑损伤与驾驶:综述
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987 Oct;68(10):697-705.
7
Traumatic brain injury associated with combat ocular trauma.与战斗性眼外伤相关的创伤性脑损伤。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009 Jan-Feb;24(1):41-50. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181956ffd.
8
Driving and driving cessation after traumatic brain injury: processes and key times of need.颅脑损伤后驾驶和驾驶停止:需求的过程和关键时间。
Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(25-26):2574-86. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.582922. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
9
Quantitative T2 mapping as a potential marker for the initial assessment of the severity of damage after traumatic brain injury in rat.定量T2映射作为大鼠创伤性脑损伤后损伤严重程度初始评估的潜在标志物。
Exp Neurol. 2009 May;217(1):154-64. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.01.026. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
10
Benefits of categorization training in patients with traumatic brain injury during post-acute rehabilitation: additional evidence from a randomized controlled trial.急性后期康复期间分类训练对创伤性脑损伤患者的益处:一项随机对照试验的补充证据
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2008 Sep-Oct;23(5):312-28. doi: 10.1097/01.HTR.0000336844.99079.2c.

引用本文的文献

1
Driving after pediatric traumatic brain injury: Impact of distraction and executive functioning.儿童创伤性脑损伤后驾驶:分心和执行功能的影响。
Rehabil Psychol. 2020 Aug;65(3):268-278. doi: 10.1037/rep0000329. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
2
Driving Behaviors 2-3 Years After Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation: A Multicenter Case-Control Study.创伤性脑损伤康复后2至3年的驾驶行为:一项多中心病例对照研究。
Front Neurol. 2019 Mar 7;10:144. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00144. eCollection 2019.
3
The relationship of neuropsychological variables to driving status following holistic neurorehabilitation.
整体神经康复后神经心理学变量与驾驶状态的关系。
Front Neurol. 2014 Apr 23;5:56. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00056. eCollection 2014.
4
Driving difficulties and adaptive strategies: the perception of individuals having sustained a mild traumatic brain injury.驾驶困难与适应性策略:轻度创伤性脑损伤患者的认知
Rehabil Res Pract. 2012;2012:837301. doi: 10.1155/2012/837301. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
5
Neural substrates of driving behaviour.驾驶行为的神经基础。
Neuroimage. 2007 May 15;36(1):245-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.032. Epub 2007 Mar 3.