Tamietto Marco, Torrini Gaia, Adenzato Mauro, Pietrapiana Paolo, Rago Roberto, Perino Claudio
Department of Psychology and Center for Cognitive Science, University of Torino, and Ausiliatrice Hospital, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi-ONLUS, Turin, Italy.
NeuroRehabilitation. 2006;21(1):81-92.
Development of reliable procedures to assess fitness to safe driving after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a crucial step in rehabilitation. However, prior studies are highly inconsistent in the choice of measures recommended for predicting driving fitness from different pre-driving measures. In the present paper the relevant literature is reviewed with the aim of shedding light on the reasons for these inconsistencies. The discrepant results reflect investigative choices which differ in five aspects: (1) the type of predictors used as pre-driving screening; (2) the type of measures considered as the criterion for the determination of fitness to drive after TBI; (3) the severity of the TBI in the sample of patients studied; (4) the extent of the neural structures damaged by TBI and the overlap of these areas with those involved in driving tasks; (5) the length of the follow-up considered. The strengths and weaknesses of the different methods and measures are discussed with their implications for future research and clinical rehabilitation. Encouraging findings come from recent studies that combined together medical, psychosocial, and personality measures, thereby improving the explanatory power of the predictors used. The use of post-injury driving fitness measures with great ecological and external validity seems equally promising in assessing actual driving in the real world.
制定可靠的程序以评估创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后安全驾驶的适宜性是康复过程中的关键一步。然而,先前的研究在推荐用于从不同驾驶前测量指标预测驾驶适宜性的测量方法选择上高度不一致。在本文中,对相关文献进行了综述,旨在阐明这些不一致的原因。结果的差异反映了在五个方面不同的研究选择:(1)用作驾驶前筛查的预测指标类型;(2)被视为TBI后确定驾驶适宜性标准的测量方法类型;(3)所研究患者样本中TBI的严重程度;(4)TBI损伤的神经结构范围以及这些区域与驾驶任务相关区域的重叠情况;(5)所考虑的随访时间长度。讨论了不同方法和测量指标的优缺点及其对未来研究和临床康复的影响。近期研究将医学、心理社会和人格测量指标结合起来,从而提高了所用预测指标的解释力,这些研究得出了令人鼓舞的结果。使用具有高度生态效度和外部效度的损伤后驾驶适宜性测量指标在评估现实世界中的实际驾驶情况方面似乎同样具有前景。