• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保留皮肤的乳房切除术的肿瘤学考量

Oncological considerations of skin-sparing mastectomy.

作者信息

Cunnick G H, Mokbel K

机构信息

Wycombe General Hospital, Queen Alexandra Road, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, HP11 2TT, UK.

出版信息

Int Semin Surg Oncol. 2006 May 25;3:14. doi: 10.1186/1477-7800-3-14.

DOI:10.1186/1477-7800-3-14
PMID:16725046
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1481515/
Abstract

AIM

To review evidence concerning the oncological safety of performing skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) for invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Furthermore, the evidence concerning RT in relation to SSM and the possibility of nipple preservation was considered.

METHODS

Literature review facilitated by Medline and PubMed databases.

FINDINGS

Despite the lack of randomised controlled trials, SSM has become an accepted procedure in women undergoing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction for early breast cancer. Compared to non-skin-sparing mastectomy (NSSM), SSM seems to be oncologically safe in patients undergoing mastectomy for invasive tumours smaller than 5 cm, multicentric tumours, DCIS or risk-reduction. However, the technique should be avoided in patients with inflammatory breast cancer or in those with extensive tumour involvement of the skin in view of the high risk of local recurrence. SSM with nipple areola complex (NAC) preservation appears to be oncologically safe, provided the tumour is not close to the nipple and a frozen section protocol for the retro-areolar tissue is followed. Although radiotherapy (RT) does not represent a contraindication to SSM, the latter should be used with caution if postoperative RT is likely, since it detracts from the final cosmetic outcome.

摘要

目的

回顾有关对浸润性乳腺癌和原位导管癌(DCIS)行保留皮肤乳房切除术(SSM)的肿瘤学安全性的证据。此外,还考虑了与SSM相关的放疗证据以及保留乳头的可能性。

方法

通过Medline和PubMed数据库进行文献综述。

结果

尽管缺乏随机对照试验,但SSM已成为早期乳腺癌行乳房切除术及即刻重建的女性所接受的术式。与非保留皮肤乳房切除术(NSSM)相比,对于肿瘤小于5 cm的浸润性肿瘤、多中心肿瘤、DCIS或出于降低风险目的而行乳房切除术的患者,SSM在肿瘤学上似乎是安全的。然而,鉴于局部复发风险高,炎性乳腺癌患者或皮肤有广泛肿瘤累及的患者应避免采用该技术。如果肿瘤不靠近乳头且遵循乳晕后组织冰冻切片方案,保留乳头乳晕复合体(NAC)的SSM在肿瘤学上似乎是安全的。虽然放疗(RT)并非SSM的禁忌证,但如果可能进行术后放疗,则应谨慎使用SSM,因为它会影响最终的美容效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7523/1481515/e8050204c945/1477-7800-3-14-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7523/1481515/32431d9edefc/1477-7800-3-14-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7523/1481515/49a61c01c0df/1477-7800-3-14-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7523/1481515/e8050204c945/1477-7800-3-14-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7523/1481515/32431d9edefc/1477-7800-3-14-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7523/1481515/49a61c01c0df/1477-7800-3-14-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7523/1481515/e8050204c945/1477-7800-3-14-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Oncological considerations of skin-sparing mastectomy.保留皮肤的乳房切除术的肿瘤学考量
Int Semin Surg Oncol. 2006 May 25;3:14. doi: 10.1186/1477-7800-3-14.
2
Oncological and aesthetic considerations of skin-sparing mastectomy.保乳皮肤全乳切除术的肿瘤学及美学考量
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Oct;111(3):391-403. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9801-7. Epub 2007 Oct 28.
3
Nipple skin-sparing mastectomy is feasible for advanced disease.保乳头乳晕的乳房切除术适用于晚期疾病。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;20(10):3294-302. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3174-4. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
4
[Skin-sparing mastectomy: an alternative to conventional mastectomy in breast cancer].
Cir Esp. 2008 Oct;84(4):181-7. doi: 10.1016/s0009-739x(08)72617-4.
5
Evolving role of skin sparing mastectomy.保留皮肤乳房切除术的演变作用
World J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 10;5(2):33-5. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i2.33.
6
Nipple-sparing and skin-sparing mastectomy: Review of aims, oncological safety and contraindications.保留乳头和皮肤的乳房切除术:目的、肿瘤安全性和禁忌证的综述。
Breast. 2017 Aug;34 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S82-S84. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.06.034. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
7
Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure.保留乳头乳晕复合体的保乳乳房切除术及自体组织重建是一种肿瘤学上安全的手术。
Ann Surg. 2003 Jul;238(1):120-7. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000077922.38307.cd.
8
Nipple areola skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure: a single center study.保留乳头乳晕的乳房切除术联合即刻横行腹直肌肌皮瓣重建术是一种具有肿瘤安全性的手术方式:一项单中心研究。
Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):493-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c5dc4e.
9
Comparative Study of Nipple-Areola Complex Position and Patient Satisfaction After Unilateral Mastectomy and Immediate Expander-Implant Reconstruction Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy.单侧乳房切除术和即刻扩张器-植入物重建乳头保留乳房切除术与皮肤保留乳房切除术的乳头乳晕复合体位置比较研究及患者满意度。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 Apr;43(2):313-327. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1217-8. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
10
Nipple sparing mastectomy for breast cancer is associated with high patient satisfaction and safe oncological outcomes.乳腺癌保乳乳房切除术能带来较高的患者满意度和安全的肿瘤学预后。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017 Oct;46(8):637-642. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Skin-sparing mastectomy.保乳皮肤乳房切除术
Gland Surg. 2015 Dec;4(6):541-53. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.04.21.
2
Nipple-areola-complex sparing mastectomy: five years of experience in a single centre.保留乳头乳晕复合体的乳房切除术:单中心 5 年经验。
Updates Surg. 2013 Dec;65(4):289-94. doi: 10.1007/s13304-013-0226-z. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
3
A single institution experience with skin sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction.单机构开展保留皮肤乳房切除术及即刻乳房重建的经验。

本文引用的文献

1
Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction is an acceptable treatment option for patients with high-risk breast carcinoma.保留皮肤的乳房切除术及即刻乳房重建术是高危乳腺癌患者可接受的一种治疗选择。
Cancer. 2005 Mar 1;103(5):906-13. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20851.
2
Breast reconstruction with postmastectomy radiation therapy: current issues.乳房切除术后放疗的乳房重建:当前问题
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Sep 15;114(4):950-60. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000133200.99826.7f.
3
The surgical and oncological safety of immediate breast reconstruction.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012 May;94(4):286. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2012.286.
4
Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy - Extended Indications and Limitations.保留乳头的乳房切除术——扩展适应症与局限性
Breast Care (Basel). 2010 Aug;5(4):253-258. doi: 10.1159/000318186. Epub 2010 Aug 6.
5
Inframammary fold approach in breast conserving surgery for cancer.乳晕下入路在乳腺癌保乳手术中的应用。
Updates Surg. 2011 Dec;63(4):283-6. doi: 10.1007/s13304-011-0114-3. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
6
Skin-sparing mastectomy and radiotherapy: an update.保留皮肤的乳房切除术与放射治疗:最新进展
Int Semin Surg Oncol. 2006 Oct 17;3:35. doi: 10.1186/1477-7800-3-35.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004 Oct;30(8):817-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.06.003.
4
The effect of radiotherapy on the use of immediate breast reconstruction.放疗对即刻乳房重建应用的影响。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004 Jun;30(5):490-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.03.005.
5
Irradiation after immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: outcomes, complications, aesthetic results, and satisfaction among 156 patients.即刻组织扩张器/植入物乳房重建术后的放射治疗:156例患者的结果、并发症、美学效果及满意度
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Mar;113(3):877-81. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000105689.84930.e5.
6
Skin-sparing mastectomy in the UK--a review of current practice.英国的保乳皮肤乳房切除术——当前实践综述
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2004 Mar;86(2):82-6. doi: 10.1308/003588404322827437.
7
The use of skin sparing mastectomy in the treatment of breast cancer: The Emory experience.保留皮肤的乳房切除术在乳腺癌治疗中的应用:埃默里大学的经验。
Surg Oncol. 2003 Dec;12(4):265-9. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2003.09.002.
8
Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technique and results of 54 procedures.保留乳头的乳房切除术:54例手术的技术与结果
Arch Surg. 2004 Feb;139(2):148-50. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.2.148.
9
Areola-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction.
Ann Plast Surg. 2003 Dec;51(6):547-51. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000095659.93306.48.
10
Evidence-based indications for postmastectomy irradiation.
Surg Clin North Am. 2003 Aug;83(4):995-1013. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00033-1.