Suppr超能文献

[确定用于创建评估老年患者日常生活工具性活动(IADL)问卷的项目]

[Identification of items for creating a questionnaire for the assessment of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) in elderly patients].

作者信息

Martín-Lesende I, Ortiz-Lebaniegos I, Montalvillo-Delgado E, Pérez-Abad M, Sánchez-Junquera P, Rodríguez-Andrés C

机构信息

Centro de Salud Cotolino, Servicio Cántabro de Salud, Castro Urdiales, Cantabria, Spain.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2006 Apr 15;37(6):313-8. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(06)70366-3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify items to design a questionnaire to assess IADL in the elderly in the community.

DESIGN

Delphi study.

LOCATION

Community setting, primary health care.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty seven multidisciplinary experts (family doctors, geriatricians, physiotherapists, social workers, male nurses) who are members of the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine or the Spanish Geriatrics and Gerontology Society.

METHODS

Three consecutive questions sent via e-mail or fax. First: what items you would take into account in a questionnaire to assess IADL in the elderly? Second: out of the groupings select 10 you consider to be of special relevance? Third: among the 14 more most selected items, select, by scoring from 1 to 10, the ones you consider more important? In the end we obtained the 10 items to include in the questionnaire according to their scores.

RESULTS

Thirty experts answered the 3 mailings. The 53 initial proposals were grouped into 24 items. In the end we obtained the following selection (from higher to lower score): dealing with medication, use of the telephone, housework, handling money, walking outside the home, security measures and risk avoidance, shopping, dealing with doors and keys, transport use, and means of social contact.

CONCLUSIONS

Only 2 items could have gender influence (in contrast to other questionnaires), as "shopping" does not refer only to the household ones and "housework" also includes activities carried out by males. The most important items are "dealing with medication" (due to the high prevalence of problems and clinical outcomes) and "the use of the telephone" (survival item).

摘要

目的

确定用于设计评估社区老年人日常生活活动能力问卷的项目。

设计

德尔菲研究。

地点

社区环境,初级卫生保健机构。

参与者

57名多学科专家(家庭医生、老年病科医生、物理治疗师、社会工作者、男护士),他们是西班牙家庭与社区医学协会或西班牙老年医学与老年学协会的成员。

方法

通过电子邮件或传真发送三个连续的问题。第一个问题:在评估老年人日常生活活动能力的问卷中,您会考虑哪些项目?第二个问题:从这些分组中选出您认为特别相关的10项?第三个问题:在被选最多的14个项目中,按照1到10分进行评分,选出您认为更重要的项目?最后,我们根据得分获得了问卷中要包含的10个项目。

结果

30名专家回复了这3次邮件。最初的53条建议被归纳为24个项目。最后我们得到了以下选择(从高分到低分):处理药物、使用电话、家务、理财、外出散步、安全措施与风险规避、购物、处理门和钥匙、使用交通工具、社交联系方式。

结论

与其他问卷不同,只有2个项目可能存在性别影响,因为“购物”不仅指家庭购物,“家务”也包括男性进行的活动。最重要的项目是“处理药物”(由于问题和临床结果的高发生率)和“使用电话”(生存项目)。

相似文献

4

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验