Suppr超能文献

[用于评估老年人日常生活工具性活动(iADL)的VIDA问卷的可靠性]

[Reliability of the VIDA questionnaire for assessing instrumental activities of daily living (iADL) in the elderly].

作者信息

Martín Lesende Iñaki, Quintana Cantero Silvia, Urzay Atucha Virginia, Ganzarain Oyarbide Elixabete, Aguirre Minaña Teresa, Pedrero Jocano Juan Eduardo

机构信息

Médicos de Familia; Centro de Salud de San Ignacio, Bilbao, España.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2012 Jun;44(6):309-17. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2011.03.005. Epub 2011 Aug 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of the VIDA questionnaire, and their concordance with the "timed get up and go" test in people aged ≥75 years.

DESIGN

Descriptive study of a diagnostic test.

LOCATION

Primary Health Care. SUBJECTS-INTERVENTION: Application of 71 pairs of VIDA questionnaire, by one (38) or two professionals (33), in people aged ≥75 years with no significant sensory or physical-psychic impairment. Stratified sample based on ADL (Barthel index) to obtain a variety of responses that would ensure a range of scores of the questionnaire.

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

Overall score of VIDA questionnaire, "get up and go" test (functional), Pfeiffer questionnaire (cognitive), and risk factors of frailty (comorbidity, falls, recent hospitalisation, sensory disturbance, social impairment, polypharmacy).

RESULTS

Mean age 81.3 years±4.8, with a 65.5% moderate-severe change in Barthel index. The mean score of the questionnaire was 31.3±7.9, with a rank of 11 to 38 (maximum). There were no differences according to gender (P=0.78). Inter-examiner reliability (n 33): Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) 0.94, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.88-0.97, P<0.0001. Intra-examiner reliability (n 38): ICC 0.96, CI 0.93-0.98, P<0.0001. Correlation coefficient (rho of Spearman) with the "get up and go" test (n 67) 0.61 (moderate), P<0.0001. Lower score if there are ≥ 2 frailty factors (P=0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

VIDA questionnaire is a very reliable tool, with no gender bias. It demonstrates an association with other functionality measures and with frailty factors in the elderly.

摘要

目的

分析VIDA问卷在检查者之间和检查者内部的信度,以及其与≥75岁人群的“定时起立行走”测试的一致性。

设计

诊断试验的描述性研究。

地点

初级卫生保健机构。

研究对象-干预措施:由一名(38例)或两名专业人员(33例)对71对≥75岁、无明显感觉或身心障碍的人群应用VIDA问卷。根据日常生活活动能力(Barthel指数)进行分层抽样,以获得能够确保问卷有一系列分数的各种反应。

主要测量指标

VIDA问卷总分、“起立行走”测试(功能)、Pfeiffer问卷(认知)以及衰弱风险因素(合并症、跌倒、近期住院、感觉障碍、社会功能障碍、多重用药)。

结果

平均年龄81.3岁±4.8岁,Barthel指数中重度变化占65.5%。问卷平均得分为31.3±7.9,范围为11至38分(满分)。按性别无差异(P=0.78)。检查者间信度(n=33):组内相关系数(ICC)为0.94,95%置信区间(CI)为0.88-0.97,P<0.0001。检查者内信度(n=38):ICC为0.96,CI为0.93-0.98,P<0.0001。与“起立行走”测试的相关系数(Spearman秩相关系数,n=67)为0.61(中等),P<0.0001。若存在≥2个衰弱因素则得分较低(P=0.015)。

结论

VIDA问卷是一个非常可靠的工具,无性别偏倚。它显示出与老年人的其他功能测量指标以及衰弱因素之间存在关联。

相似文献

6
[Prioritization by patients of a series of common components in the standard comprehensive geriatric assessment in Primary Care].
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2022 Jan-Feb;57(1):13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
[The frail elderly. Detection and management in Primary Care].[体弱老年人。初级保健中的检测与管理]
Aten Primaria. 2010 Jul;42(7):388-93. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2009.09.022. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
2
[Frailty detection and prevention: a new challenge in elderly for dependence prevention].
Med Clin (Barc). 2010 Nov 20;135(15):713-9. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2009.04.028. Epub 2009 Jul 9.
10
Disentangling the process of disablement.厘清致残过程。
Soc Sci Med. 1999 Feb;48(4):471-2. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00371-2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验