Long Maureen T, Jeter William, Hernandez Jorge, Sellon Debra C, Gosche David, Gillis Karen, Bille Emily, Gibbs E Paul
Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32511-0136, USA.
J Vet Intern Med. 2006 May-Jun;20(3):608-13. doi: 10.1892/0891-6640(2006)20[608:dpotei]2.0.co;2.
The objectives of these studies were to assess the diagnostic performance (sensitivity and specificity) of the IgM capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; MAC) for diagnosis of West Nile (WN) virus in horses and to examine the performance of this test by using different criteria for seropositivity. A total of 36 horses classified as WN virus infected (group 1) and 383 horses from 4 subpopulations of hoses classified as noninfected (groups 2, 3, 4, and 5) were used in the study. The sensitivity (proportion of infected horses that tested positive for WN virus IgM antibodies) and specificity (proportion of noninfected horses that tested negative) were calculated at different cutoff points by using receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis. Using a selected cutoff point = 2.0, the sensitivity and specificity of the MAC were 91.7 and 99.2%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve = 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 to 1.0), suggesting that the MAC is a useful tool for diagnosis of recent WN virus exposure in horses. In fulfillment of the 2nd objective, 2 other indices were developed and these indices approached 1.0 for the AUC with smaller 95% CIs. These indices were then used to test 602 additional diagnostic samples submitted from suspect horses between 2002 and 2004. Using the standard cutoff, 194 (32%) of the horses were interpreted as positive. Utilizing newly predicted cutoff criteria from each index, additional horses were identified as positive. In conclusion, the MAC as used for identification of WN virus-diseased horses undergoing recent exposure performs reliably at the standard cutoff for seropositivity. A negative test might not completely rule out WN virus disease, but horses that test negative were most likely not exposed to WNV. Performance of the test can be further improved by investigation of other indexes of seropositivity.
这些研究的目的是评估用于诊断马匹西尼罗河(WN)病毒的IgM捕获酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA;MAC)的诊断性能(敏感性和特异性),并通过使用不同的血清阳性标准来检验该检测方法的性能。该研究共使用了36匹被分类为感染WN病毒的马(第1组)和来自4个马群亚群的383匹被分类为未感染的马(第2、3、4和5组)。通过使用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析,在不同的临界值下计算敏感性(检测WN病毒IgM抗体呈阳性的感染马的比例)和特异性(检测呈阴性的未感染马的比例)。使用选定的临界值=2.0时,MAC的敏感性和特异性分别为91.7%和99.2%。ROC曲线下面积=0.95(95%置信区间[CI],0.89至1.0),表明MAC是诊断马匹近期WN病毒暴露的有用工具。为实现第二个目标,开发了另外两个指标,这些指标的AUC接近1.0,95%CI更小。然后使用这些指标对2002年至2004年间从疑似马匹提交的另外602份诊断样本进行检测。使用标准临界值时,194匹(32%)马被判定为阳性。利用每个指标新预测的临界标准,又有更多马匹被判定为阳性。总之,用于识别近期暴露的WN病毒病马的MAC在血清阳性的标准临界值下表现可靠。阴性检测结果可能无法完全排除WN病毒病,但检测呈阴性的马很可能未接触过西尼罗病毒。通过研究其他血清阳性指标可进一步提高该检测方法的性能。