• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者自主选择的阴道分娩?

Patient-choice vaginal delivery?

作者信息

Leeman Lawrence M, Plante Lauren A

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

出版信息

Ann Fam Med. 2006 May-Jun;4(3):265-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.537.

DOI:10.1370/afm.537
PMID:16735530
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1479446/
Abstract

Patient-choice cesarean delivery is increasing in the United States. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists supports this option, citing ethical premises of autonomy and informed consent, despite a lack of evidence for its safety. This increase in patient-choice cesarean delivery occurs during a time when women with a breech-presenting fetus or a previous cesarean section have fewer choices as to vaginal birth. Patient-choice cesarean delivery may become widely disseminated before the potential risks to women and their children have been well analyzed. The growing pressure for cesarean delivery in the absence of a medical indication may ultimately result in a decrease of women's childbirth options. Advocacy of patient-choice requires preserving vaginal birth options as well as cesarean delivery.

摘要

在美国,患者自主选择剖宫产的情况日益增多。美国妇产科医师学会支持这一选择,理由是自主和知情同意的伦理前提,尽管缺乏其安全性的证据。在臀位胎儿或曾行剖宫产的女性选择阴道分娩的机会减少之际,患者自主选择剖宫产的情况却在增加。在对女性及其子女的潜在风险进行充分分析之前,患者自主选择剖宫产可能就已广泛传播。在没有医学指征的情况下,剖宫产的压力不断增加,最终可能导致女性分娩选择的减少。倡导患者自主选择需要保留阴道分娩和剖宫产这两种选择。

相似文献

1
Patient-choice vaginal delivery?患者自主选择的阴道分娩?
Ann Fam Med. 2006 May-Jun;4(3):265-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.537.
2
The ethics of cesarean section on maternal request: a feminist critique of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' position on patient-choice surgery.
Bioethics. 2007 Nov;21(9):478-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00593.x.
3
Patient choice cesarean--the Maine experience.患者自主选择剖宫产——缅因州的经验
Birth. 2005 Sep;32(3):203-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00370.x.
4
Cesarean section without clinical indication versus vaginal delivery as a paradigmatic model in the discourse of medical setting decisions.无临床指征剖宫产与阴道分娩作为医疗环境决策话语中的范例模型
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Dec;24(12):1470-5. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2010.538279. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
5
Making choices for childbirth: a randomized controlled trial of a decision-aid for informed birth after cesarean.剖宫产术后知情分娩决策辅助工具的随机对照试验:为分娩做出选择
Birth. 2005 Dec;32(4):252-61. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00383.x.
6
Patient choice cesarean delivery: ethical issues.患者选择剖宫产:伦理问题。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;20(2):116-9. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3282f55df7.
7
Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.首次分娩对女性分娩方式偏好变化的影响:一项纵向观察性研究的随访
Birth. 2008 Jun;35(2):121-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00225.x.
8
[Decision making on breech delivery: information as a way to reconcile maternal autonomy and medical responsibility].[臀位分娩的决策:以信息作为调和产妇自主权与医疗责任的方式]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2009 Jun;37(6):464-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2009.04.001. Epub 2009 May 20.
9
Ethical dimensions of elective primary cesarean delivery.择期剖宫产的伦理维度
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Feb;103(2):387-92. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000107288.44622.2a.
10
Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.39周选择性剖宫产:对肩难产、胎儿创伤、新生儿脑病及胎儿宫内死亡的影响
Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct;30(5):276-87. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.009.

引用本文的文献

1
The struggle over caesarean section on maternal request: an ethical principles approach to Swedish media portrayal.关于产妇要求剖宫产的争论:瑞典媒体报道的伦理原则视角
Reprod Health. 2025 Jun 27;22(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02057-3.
2
Association of facility-based normal delivery healthcare services access with health facility factors: evidence from linked population and health facility survey data in Bangladesh.基于机构的正常分娩医疗服务可及性与医疗机构因素的关联:来自孟加拉国人口与医疗机构调查关联数据的证据
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 15;25(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12402-8.
3
Is it the decision of women to choose a cesarean section as the mode of birth? A review of literature on the views of stakeholders.女性选择剖宫产作为分娩方式是她们的决定吗?利益相关者观点的文献综述。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Aug 9;19(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2440-2.
4
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Maedica (Bucur). 2018 Dec;13(4):286-293. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2018.13.4.286.
5
The association between antenatal anxiety and fear of childbirth in nulliparous women: a prospective study.初产妇产前焦虑与分娩恐惧之间的关联:一项前瞻性研究。
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2011 Spring;16(2):169-73.
6
On TRACK: medical research must consider context and complexity.步入正轨:医学研究必须考虑背景和复杂性。
Ann Fam Med. 2006 Jul-Aug;4(4):369-70. doi: 10.1370/afm.613.

本文引用的文献

1
Mode of delivery and problems in subsequent births: a register-based study from Finland.分娩方式及后续分娩中的问题:一项基于芬兰登记处的研究
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):169-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.007.
2
Investigating the relationship between affluence and elective caesarean sections.
BJOG. 2005 Jul;112(7):994-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00657.x.
3
Obstetric antecedents for postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction.产后盆底功能障碍的产科相关因素
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;192(5):1655-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.031.
4
Neonatal impact of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term: a comment on patient choice cesarean delivery.足月选择性重复剖宫产对新生儿的影响:关于患者选择剖宫产的评论
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;192(5):1433-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.01.010.
5
Outcomes of routine episiotomy: a systematic review.常规会阴切开术的结局:一项系统评价
JAMA. 2005 May 4;293(17):2141-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.17.2141.
6
Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.既往剖宫产术后试产相关的母儿结局
N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 16;351(25):2581-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040405. Epub 2004 Dec 14.
7
Results of the national study of vaginal birth after cesarean in birth centers.剖宫产术后经阴道分娩在分娩中心的全国性研究结果。
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Nov;104(5 Pt 1):933-42. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000143257.29471.82.
8
Comparison of maternal mortality and morbidity between trial of labor and elective cesarean section among women with previous cesarean delivery.既往有剖宫产史的女性中,试产与择期剖宫产的孕产妇死亡率和发病率比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Oct;191(4):1263-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.022.
9
Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial.足月臀位计划剖宫产与计划阴道分娩后2岁儿童的结局:国际足月臀位随机试验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Sep;191(3):864-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.056.
10
ACOG Practice Bulletin #54: vaginal birth after previous cesarean.美国妇产科医师学会实践公告第54号:既往剖宫产术后经阴道分娩
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;104(1):203-12.