Suppr超能文献

在一个以社区为基础的队列研究中,7352例首次因心力衰竭住院后出院的患者使用阿司匹林的情况及预后。

Aspirin use and outcomes in a community-based cohort of 7352 patients discharged after first hospitalization for heart failure.

作者信息

McAlister Finlay A, Ghali William A, Gong Yanyan, Fang Jiming, Armstrong Paul W, Tu Jack V

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

Circulation. 2006 Jun 6;113(22):2572-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.602136. Epub 2006 May 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The safety of aspirin in heart failure (HF) has been called into question, particularly in those patients (1) without coronary disease, (2) with renal dysfunction, or (3) treated with low-dose angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and high-dose aspirin.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined prescription patterns and outcomes (all-cause mortality and/or HF readmission) in patients discharged from 103 Canadian hospitals between April 1999 and March 2001 after a first hospitalization for HF. Of 7352 patients with HF (mean age, 75 years; 44% without coronary disease and 29% with renal dysfunction), 2785 (38%) died or required HF readmission within the first year. Compared with nonusers, aspirin users were no more likely to die or require HF readmission (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02 [0.91 to 1.16]), even in patients without coronary disease (HR, 0.98 [0.78 to 1.22]) or patients with renal dysfunction (HR, 1.13 [0.94 to 1.36]). On the other hand, users of ACE inhibitors were less likely to die or require HF readmission (HR, 0.87 [0.79 to 0.96]), even if they were using aspirin (HR, 0.86 [0.77 to 0.95]). There were no dose-dependent interactions between aspirin and ACE inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

In this observational study, aspirin use was not associated with an increase in mortality rates or HF readmission rates, and aspirin did not attenuate the benefits of ACE inhibitors, even in patients without coronary disease, patients with renal dysfunction, or patients treated with high-dose aspirin and low-dose ACE inhibitors.

摘要

背景

阿司匹林在心力衰竭(HF)中的安全性受到质疑,尤其是在那些(1)无冠心病、(2)有肾功能不全或(3)接受低剂量血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂和高剂量阿司匹林治疗的患者中。

方法与结果

我们调查了1999年4月至2001年3月间因首次HF住院后从103家加拿大医院出院的患者的处方模式和结局(全因死亡率和/或HF再入院率)。在7352例HF患者(平均年龄75岁;44%无冠心病,29%有肾功能不全)中,2785例(38%)在第一年内死亡或需要HF再入院。与未使用阿司匹林的患者相比,使用阿司匹林的患者死亡或需要HF再入院的可能性并不更高(风险比[HR],1.02[0.91至1.16]),即使在无冠心病的患者中(HR,0.98[0.78至1.22])或有肾功能不全的患者中(HR,1.13[0.94至1.36])也是如此。另一方面,ACE抑制剂使用者死亡或需要HF再入院的可能性较小(HR,0.87[0.79至0.96]),即使他们同时使用阿司匹林(HR,0.86[0.77至0.95])。阿司匹林与ACE抑制剂之间不存在剂量依赖性相互作用。

结论

在这项观察性研究中,使用阿司匹林与死亡率或HF再入院率的增加无关,并且阿司匹林不会减弱ACE抑制剂的益处,即使在无冠心病的患者、有肾功能不全的患者或接受高剂量阿司匹林和低剂量ACE抑制剂治疗的患者中也是如此。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验