Faculty of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, 3126 Dentistry / Pharmacy Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6G 2N8.
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Nov;26(11):1336-44. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1757-y. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
Pharmacologic evidence suggests adequate antiplatelet activity in diabetic patients requires >100 mg aspirin daily, yet recent trials have used ≤100 mg daily. This meta-analysis explored the relationship between aspirin dose and prevention of cardiovascular events.
Six electronic databases were searched using database-appropriate terms for aspirin, diabetes, and comparative study from inception until February 2010.
Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing aspirin to no antiplatelet therapy were included if they reported cardiovascular events as pre-specified outcomes, aspirin dose, and number of diabetic patients. Studies were stratified by daily aspirin dose (≤100 mg; 101-325 mg; >325 mg) and pooled risk ratios (RR) were calculated using random effects models. All-cause mortality was the primary outcome of interest. Cardiovascular-related mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke were secondary outcomes.
Data for diabetic patients were available from 21 studies (n = 17,522). Overall, 1,172 (15.4%) of 7,592 aspirin users and 1,520 (18.4%) of 8,269 controls died (p = 0.31). The pooled RRs were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.72-1.10; p = 0.27) from 13 studies using ≤100 mg (I(2) = 64%); 0.89 (95% CI: 0.61-1.30; p = 0.55) from four studies using 101-325 mg (I(2) = 83%); and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.85-1.08; p = 0.50) from eight studies using >325 mg (I(2) = 0%). Aspirin use was associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality (RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.69-0.98; p = 0.03) in 13 secondary prevention studies (I(2) = 27%), whereas aspirin use in seven primary prevention studies (I(2) = 0%) was not (RR: 1.01; 95% CI 0.85-1.19; p = 0.94). A substantial amount of heterogeneity was observed amongst studies in all outcomes. Although inclusion of cohort studies was a major source of heterogeneity, stratification by study design did not reveal a significant dose-response relationship.
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: This summary of available data does not support an aspirin dose-response effect for prevention of cardiovascular events in diabetic patients. However, the systematic review identified an important gap in randomized controlled trial evidence for using 101-325 mg aspirin daily in diabetes.
药理学证据表明,糖尿病患者需要每天服用超过 100 毫克的阿司匹林才能达到充分的抗血小板作用,但最近的试验使用的剂量每天都低于 100 毫克。本荟萃分析探讨了阿司匹林剂量与预防心血管事件之间的关系。
从各数据库建立开始至 2010 年 2 月,使用数据库中适当的阿司匹林、糖尿病和对比研究术语,对 6 个电子数据库进行了检索。
纳入了比较阿司匹林与无抗血小板治疗的随机对照试验和队列研究,如果这些研究报告了心血管事件作为预先指定的结局、阿司匹林剂量和糖尿病患者数量,则将其纳入研究。根据每日阿司匹林剂量(≤100mg;101-325mg;>325mg)对研究进行分层,并使用随机效应模型计算风险比(RR)。全因死亡率是主要的观察终点。心血管相关死亡率、心肌梗死和卒中等是次要终点。
21 项研究(n=17522 例患者)提供了糖尿病患者的数据。总的来说,1172 例(15.4%)接受阿司匹林治疗的患者和 1520 例(18.4%)接受安慰剂治疗的患者死亡(p=0.31)。来自 13 项使用≤100mg 剂量的研究的汇总 RR 为 0.89(95%CI:0.72-1.10;p=0.27)(I²=64%);来自 4 项使用 101-325mg 剂量的研究的 RR 为 0.89(95%CI:0.61-1.30;p=0.55)(I²=83%);来自 8 项使用>325mg 剂量的研究的 RR 为 0.96(95%CI:0.85-1.08;p=0.50)(I²=0%)。在 13 项二级预防研究中(I²=27%),阿司匹林治疗与死亡率显著降低相关(RR:0.82;95%CI:0.69-0.98;p=0.03),而在 7 项一级预防研究中(I²=0%),阿司匹林治疗与死亡率无相关性(RR:1.01;95%CI:0.85-1.19;p=0.94)。所有结局的研究均存在大量异质性。虽然纳入了队列研究是造成异质性的主要原因,但分层研究设计并没有显示出剂量-反应关系的显著差异。
结论/解释:对现有数据的总结不支持阿司匹林剂量与糖尿病患者心血管事件预防之间存在剂量反应关系。然而,系统评价发现,在使用 101-325mg 阿司匹林进行糖尿病一级预防方面,随机对照试验证据存在重要空白。