Bowley Douglas M, Barker Philip, Boffard Kenneth D
Department of Surgery, University of the Witwatersrand Medical School, Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa.
World J Surg. 2006 Jun;30(6):1074-80. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0466-2.
Blood is a scarce and costly resource. Transfusion is often required after major trauma but blood may not be readily available, and concerns remain over the potential adverse consequences of allogeneic blood transfusion. Intraoperative blood salvage (IBS) is used extensively after blunt abdominal trauma, but when blood is contaminated by enteric contents its use has been considered contraindicated.
This was a randomised, controlled trial conducted with Ethical Review Board approval in an inner city trauma unit. Patients with penetrating torso injury requiring a laparotomy and who had exhibited hypotension either pre-hospital or on arrival and in whom there was considered to be significant blood loss were randomly assigned to 2 groups. The control group was given allogeneic blood transfusion at the discretion of the attending medical staff. The cell save (CS) group underwent IBS with transfusion of both allogeneic and autologous blood. All patients received prophylactic antibiotics. The primary outcome was exposure to allogeneic blood up to the first 24 hours postinjury.
Twenty-three patients were entered into the control group and 21 into the CS group. The groups were equivalent in demographic details, injury patterns and injury severity. The mean volume of salvaged blood re-infused in the CS group was 1,493 ml (range 0-2,690 ml). The mean number of units of allogeneic blood transfused in the first 24 hours in the control group was 11.17 compared to 6.47 in the CS group (P=0.008). Enteric injury had been sustained in 17/23 (75%) of the control group and 18/21 (85%) of the CS group (P=NS). Survival in the control group was 8/23 (35%) compared to 7/21 (33.3%) in the CS arm (P=NS). Patients with documented postoperative sepsis were significantly more likely to die compared to those without sepsis (P=0.04); however, those patients in the CS arm were no more likely to develop sepsis compared to those who received allogeneic blood alone.
In this randomised, controlled trial for patients with penetrating abdominal injuries, IBS led to a significant reduction in allogeneic blood usage with no discernable effect on rates of postoperative infection or mortality.
血液是一种稀缺且昂贵的资源。重大创伤后常需输血,但血液可能难以立即获取,且异体输血的潜在不良后果仍令人担忧。术中血液回收(IBS)在钝性腹部创伤后广泛应用,但当血液被肠内容物污染时,其使用被视为禁忌。
这是一项在市中心创伤病房进行的随机对照试验,经伦理审查委员会批准。因穿透性躯干损伤需剖腹手术且在院前或入院时出现低血压且被认为有大量失血的患者被随机分为两组。对照组由主治医务人员酌情给予异体输血。细胞回收(CS)组进行术中血液回收,并输注异体血和自体血。所有患者均接受预防性抗生素治疗。主要结局是伤后24小时内异体血的输注情况。
23例患者进入对照组,21例进入CS组。两组在人口统计学细节、损伤类型和损伤严重程度方面相当。CS组回输的回收血液平均量为1493毫升(范围0 - 2690毫升)。对照组伤后24小时内输注的异体血平均单位数为11.17,而CS组为6.47(P = 0.008)。对照组23例中有17例(75%)发生肠损伤,CS组21例中有18例(85%)发生肠损伤(P = 无显著差异)。对照组的生存率为8/23(35%),CS组为7/21(33.3%)(P = 无显著差异)。有术后败血症记录的患者比无败血症的患者死亡可能性显著更高(P = 0.04);然而,与仅接受异体血的患者相比,CS组患者发生败血症的可能性并不更高。
在这项针对穿透性腹部损伤患者的随机对照试验中,术中血液回收导致异体血使用量显著减少,对术后感染率或死亡率无明显影响。