Bereznicki Luke R, Jackson Shane L, Peterson Gregory M, Jeffrey Ella C, Marsden Katherine A, Jupe David M
Unit for Medication Outcomes Research and Education, School of Pharmacy, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
J Clin Pathol. 2007 Mar;60(3):311-4. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2006.037820. Epub 2006 Jun 2.
To evaluate the accuracy of the CoaguChek XS international normalised ratio (INR) monitor compared with the laboratory method.
The accuracy and ease of use of the recently marketed CoaguChek XS portable INR monitor was evaluated in 17 patients involved in a trial of warfarin home monitoring. INR results from the monitor were compared with those from the laboratory method. Clinical applicability was measured by discrepant INR values, defined in the literature by expanded and narrow agreement criteria, and by the proportion of INR values differing by >15% and by >20% from those derived by the laboratory method.
Participants provided 59 comparison INR measurements for analysis. The paired results were highly correlated (r = 0.91). Expanded and narrow agreement between paired INR values occurred 100% of the time. Only three CoaguChek XS (5.1%) results differed by >15% compared with the laboratory method; no results differed by >20% or were discrepant by >0.5 INR units.
In the hands of patients the CoaguChek XS showed good correlation with laboratory determination of INR and compared well with expanded and narrow clinical agreement criteria. Both patients and doctors were highly satisfied with the accuracy and ease of use of the CoaguChek XS.
评估CoaguChek XS国际标准化比值(INR)监测仪与实验室检测方法相比的准确性。
在17名参与华法林家庭监测试验的患者中,评估了近期上市的CoaguChek XS便携式INR监测仪的准确性和易用性。将监测仪得出的INR结果与实验室检测方法得出的结果进行比较。临床适用性通过差异INR值来衡量,差异INR值在文献中由宽泛和严格的一致性标准定义,以及通过与实验室检测方法得出的结果相差>15%和>20%的INR值比例来衡量。
参与者提供了59次用于分析的INR对比测量值。配对结果高度相关(r = 0.91)。配对INR值之间的宽泛和严格一致性在所有情况下均出现。与实验室检测方法相比,只有三次CoaguChek XS(5.1%)的结果相差>15%;没有结果相差>20%或相差>0.5个INR单位。
在患者使用中,CoaguChek XS与实验室测定的INR显示出良好的相关性,并且与宽泛和严格的临床一致性标准相比表现良好。患者和医生对CoaguChek XS的准确性和易用性都非常满意。