Bassen H, Kainz W, Mendoza G, Kellom T
US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2006;15(2):76-84. doi: 10.1080/13645700600640931.
We performed experiments and computer modeling of heating of a cardiovascular stent and a straight, thin wire by RF fields in a 1.5 T MRI birdcage coil at 64 MHz. We used ASTM F2182-02a standard and normalized results to 4 W/kg whole body average. We used a rectangular saline-gel filled phantom and a coiled, double stent (Intracoil by ev3 Inc) 11 cm long. The stent had thin electrical insulation except for bare ends (simulating drug eluting coating). The stent and phantom were placed close to the wall of the RF Coil and had approximately 0.5 degrees C initial temperature rise at the ends (local SAR = 320 W/kg). We exposed a wire (24.1 cm, 0.5 mm diameter) with 0.5 mm insulation and saw an 8.6 degrees C temperature rise (local SAR = 5,680 W/kg) at the bare ends. All heating was within 1 mm3 of the ends, so the position of our fiber optic temperature probe was critical for repeatability. Our computational study used finite difference time domain software with a thermodynamics solver. We modeled a coiled bare-wire stent as a spiral with a rectangular cross section and found a maximum increase of 0.05 degrees C induced at the tips for plane wave exposures. A maximum local SAR of up to 200 W/kg occurred in a volume of only 8 x 10(-3) mm. We developed improved computational exposure sources-- optimized birdcage coils and quasi-MRI fields that may eliminate the need to model an RF coil. We learned that local (point) SAR (initial linear temperature rise) is the most reliable indicator of the maximum heating of an implant. Local SAR depends greatly on implant length, insulation and shape, and position in the MRI coil. Accurate heating must be measured with sensors or software having millimeter resolution. Many commercially available fiber optic temperature probes do meet this requirement.
我们在1.5T、64MHz的MRI鸟笼式线圈中,对心血管支架和直的细导线进行了射频场加热实验及计算机建模。我们采用ASTM F2182 - 02a标准,并将结果归一化为4W/kg的全身平均水平。我们使用了一个填充有盐水凝胶的矩形体模和一个11厘米长的盘绕双支架(ev3公司的Intracoil)。该支架除了裸端外有薄的电绝缘层(模拟药物洗脱涂层)。支架和体模被放置在靠近射频线圈壁的位置,两端初始温度升高约0.5摄氏度(局部比吸收率 = 320W/kg)。我们使一根带有0.5毫米绝缘层、长24.1厘米、直径0.5毫米的导线暴露,在裸端看到温度升高8.6摄氏度(局部比吸收率 = 5680W/kg)。所有加热都发生在端部1立方毫米范围内,所以我们的光纤温度探头的位置对于可重复性至关重要。我们的计算研究使用了带有热力学求解器的时域有限差分软件。我们将盘绕的裸线支架建模为具有矩形横截面的螺旋体,发现对于平面波照射,在尖端处引起的最大温度升高为0.05摄氏度。在仅8×10⁻³立方毫米的体积中出现了高达200W/kg的最大局部比吸收率。我们开发了改进的计算暴露源——优化的鸟笼式线圈和准MRI场,这可能无需对射频线圈进行建模。我们了解到局部(点)比吸收率(初始线性温度升高)是植入物最大加热的最可靠指标。局部比吸收率很大程度上取决于植入物的长度、绝缘层、形状以及在MRI线圈中的位置。必须使用具有毫米分辨率的传感器或软件来测量精确的加热情况。许多市售的光纤温度探头确实满足这一要求。