• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《神经康复体验问卷》的土耳其语信效度研究

Turkish reliability and validity of Neurorehabilitation Experience Questionnaire.

作者信息

Yıldız Abdurrahim, Cicekli Esen

机构信息

Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation - Turkey.

Akyazı State Hospital, Department of Neurology - Turkey.

出版信息

Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2025 Jun 2;71(4):e20241781. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20241781. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1590/1806-9282.20241781
PMID:40465998
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12131890/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the Turkish validity and reliability of the Neurorehabilitation Experience Questionnaire, which assesses the experiences of patients receiving neurorehabilitation.

METHODS

Neurological patients receiving rehabilitation between October 2023 and August 2024 were included in the study. Reliability was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency and using the test-retest method to measure stability. Validity was assessed through construct and criterion validity with convergent validity tested with the Patient Care and Rehabilitation Perception Scale in Elderly Patients.

RESULTS

The mean age of the participants was 54.88 years and BMI was 28.55. The test-retest reliability of the Neurorehabilitation Experience Questionnaire showed a strong positive correlation (r=0.932, p<0.001), demonstrating the stability of the scale. A moderate, significant correlation was found between Neurorehabilitation Experience Questionnaire and Perception of Patient Care and Rehabilitation in Older Patients Scale scores (r=0.440, p<0.001). Moreover, both the first and second assessments of the Neurorehabilitation Experience Questionnaire were positively correlated with the corresponding Perception of Patient Care and Rehabilitation in Older Patients Scale assessments, strengthening the convergent validity of the questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

The Turkish version of the Neurorehabilitation Experience Questionnaire is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring neurorehabilitation experience in Turkish-speaking patients. The application of this questionnaire in clinical settings may improve patient-centered care by facilitating a better understanding of patient experiences and satisfaction in neurorehabilitation programs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估《神经康复体验问卷》在土耳其语环境下的有效性和可靠性,该问卷用于评估接受神经康复治疗患者的体验。

方法

纳入2023年10月至2024年8月期间接受康复治疗的神经科患者。通过计算内部一致性的Cronbach's alpha系数以及采用重测法来评估稳定性,以此评估可靠性。通过结构效度和效标效度进行有效性评估,并使用老年患者的患者护理与康复感知量表对收敛效度进行测试。

结果

参与者的平均年龄为54.88岁,体重指数为28.55。《神经康复体验问卷》的重测信度显示出强正相关(r = 0.932,p < 0.001),表明该量表具有稳定性。《神经康复体验问卷》与老年患者的患者护理与康复感知量表得分之间存在中度显著相关性(r = 0.440,p < 0.001)。此外,《神经康复体验问卷》的首次和第二次评估均与老年患者的患者护理与康复感知量表的相应评估呈正相关,增强了该问卷的收敛效度。

结论

《神经康复体验问卷》土耳其语版本是一种可靠且有效的工具,可用于衡量说土耳其语患者的神经康复体验。在临床环境中应用该问卷可能通过促进更好地理解患者在神经康复项目中的体验和满意度来改善以患者为中心的护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e6d/12131890/58dce16bab65/1806-9282-ramb-71-04-e20241781-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e6d/12131890/58dce16bab65/1806-9282-ramb-71-04-e20241781-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e6d/12131890/58dce16bab65/1806-9282-ramb-71-04-e20241781-gf01.jpg

相似文献

1
Turkish reliability and validity of Neurorehabilitation Experience Questionnaire.《神经康复体验问卷》的土耳其语信效度研究
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2025 Jun 2;71(4):e20241781. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20241781. eCollection 2025.
2
The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Community Integration Measure in patients with chronic stroke.慢性卒中患者社区融合测量土耳其语版本的有效性和可靠性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Jul;46(15):3457-3461. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2246368. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
3
The Turkish version of the MedRisk instrument for measuring patient satisfaction: measurement properties in physical therapy care among inpatients.土耳其语版 MedRisk 量表用于测量患者满意度:在物理治疗住院患者护理中的测量特性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Jan;42(2):247-254. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1494216. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
4
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the hand-use-at-home questionnaire for children with unilateral cerebral palsy and neonatal brachial plexus palsy.土耳其版儿童单侧脑瘫和新生儿臂丛神经麻痹家庭手部使用问卷的有效性和可靠性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Aug;46(16):3702-3708. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2248885. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
5
The Juvenile Arthritis Quality of Life Questionnaire in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Turkish version, validity, and reliability study.青少年特发性关节炎患者的青少年关节炎生活质量问卷:土耳其语版本、效度和信度研究。
Clin Rheumatol. 2024 Jun;43(6):1999-2008. doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-06962-z. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
6
The West Haven Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory: Reliability and validity of the Turkish version in individuals with cancer.西黑文耶鲁多维疼痛量表:土耳其语版本在癌症患者中的信度和效度
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Feb;20:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
7
Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Hand20 questionnaire.土耳其版 Hand20 问卷的有效性和可靠性研究。
Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Aug 8;49(4):1243-1248. doi: 10.3906/sag-1808-168.
8
Validity and reliability of the Turkish Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire.土耳其偏头痛残疾评估(MIDAS)问卷的效度和信度。
Headache. 2004 Sep;44(8):786-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2004.04146.x.
9
Validity and Reliability of the M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory in Turkish Patients with Neurological Disease.《MD安德森吞咽障碍量表在土耳其神经疾病患者中的效度与信度》
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2025;77(2):205-214. doi: 10.1159/000543534. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
10
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the medication practical barriers to adherence questionnaire in patients with chronic diseases.土耳其版药物使用障碍问卷在慢性病患者中的信度和效度。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Nov;80(11):1715-1723. doi: 10.1007/s00228-024-03735-0. Epub 2024 Aug 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Global, regional, and national burden of disorders affecting the nervous system, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.全球、区域和国家神经障碍疾病负担,1990-2021 年:2021 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2024 Apr;23(4):344-381. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00038-3. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
2
Innovative Technologies in the Neurorehabilitation of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.创伤性脑损伤神经康复中的创新技术:一项系统综述
Brain Sci. 2022 Dec 7;12(12):1678. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12121678.
3
Evaluation of Patient Motivation and Satisfaction During Technology-Assisted Rehabilitation: An Experiential Review.
评价技术辅助康复过程中的患者动机和满意度:经验回顾。
Games Health J. 2021 Feb;10(1):13-27. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2020.0024. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
4
The Role of Engagement in Teleneurorehabilitation: A Systematic Review.参与在远程神经康复中的作用:一项系统综述。
Front Neurol. 2020 May 6;11:354. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00354. eCollection 2020.
5
Psychometric evaluation of the patient perspective on care and rehabilitation scale in geriatric patients.老年患者护理和康复感知量表的心理测量学评估。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Mar-Apr;81:84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
6
Subgrouping of low back pain patients for targeting treatments: evidence from genetic, psychological, and activity-related behavioral approaches.针对治疗的腰痛患者亚组划分:来自基因、心理及与活动相关行为方法的证据
Clin J Pain. 2015 Feb;31(2):123-32. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000100.
7
Reliability and validity of the neurorehabilitation experience questionnaire for inpatients.住院患者神经康复体验问卷的信度和效度。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Sep;26(7):834-41. doi: 10.1177/1545968311431962. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
8
Patient perspective on quality of geriatric care and rehabilitation--development and psychometric testing of a questionnaire.患者对老年护理与康复质量的看法——一份问卷的编制与心理测量学测试
Scand J Caring Sci. 2006 Jun;20(2):135-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2006.00390.x.
9
Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures.自我报告测量工具跨文化适应过程指南。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.