Suppr超能文献

慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的支气管扩张试验:解读方法

The bronchodilator test in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: interpretation methods.

作者信息

Rodríguez-Carballeira M, Heredia J L, Rué M, Quintana S, Almagro P

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Mútua de Terrassa, Plaza Dr Robert, 5, 08221 Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2007 Jan;101(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.04.018. Epub 2006 Jun 8.

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate the best method for interpreting the bronchodilator test (BDT). Five formulas for expressing the BDT results were analyzed and compared: changes experienced by maximum expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)) and forced vital capacity (FVC) measured in milliliters, in percentage with respect to the baseline, in percentage with respect to the predicted, in percentage with respect to the possible, and in standardized residuals. Ninety-eight chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients were submitted to a respiratory function test on two different days. On each occasion three spirometries were conducted: basal, post-placebo and post bronchodilator. As a gold standard, a normality interval was defined using the variability experienced with the placebo between the two days of the study. The best formulas according to their sensitivity, specivity and area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were the "standardized residuals", with a cut point of .3, and the "percentage with respect to the predicted" with a cut point of 6%.

摘要

该研究的目的是评估解读支气管扩张试验(BDT)的最佳方法。分析并比较了用于表达BDT结果的五个公式:一秒用力呼气容积(FEV(1))和用力肺活量(FVC)以毫升为单位的变化、相对于基线的百分比变化、相对于预测值的百分比变化、相对于可能值的百分比变化以及标准化残差。98例慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者在两个不同日期接受了呼吸功能测试。每次进行三次肺量计检查:基础值、安慰剂后和支气管扩张剂后。作为金标准,使用研究两天间安慰剂的变异性定义了一个正常区间。根据其敏感性、特异性和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积,最佳公式是“标准化残差”,切点为0.3,以及“相对于预测值的百分比”,切点为6%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验