Dan Diana, Germann David, Burki Hubert, Hausner Peter, Kappeler Urs, Meyer Rainer Peter, Klaghofer Richard, Stoll Thomas
Division for Internal Medicine, Hospital Muri, Spitalstrasse, 5630 Muri, AG, Switzerland.
Rheumatol Int. 2006 Jul;26(9):792-8. doi: 10.1007/s00296-005-0077-0. Epub 2006 Apr 20.
The aim of the present study is to evaluate periprosthetic bone loss and to compare it with the bone loss in other areas of the body. We also aim to shed light on the course of bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with cemented femoral prosthesis in comparison with those with uncemented ones. We analyzed the BMD using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in a consecutively recruited convenience sample of 50 patients with cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA). BMD was measured within the first month after surgery as well as 1 year later. In ten of the patients (20%) previously undiagnosed osteoporosis was revealed. Osteoporosis was significantly more frequently detected in patients with cemented compared to those with uncemented femoral stem. We found a significant loss in BMD in the periprosthetic femoral region compared with no losses in other body regions (lumbar spine, radius, contralateral hip). The magnitude of this loss was the highest in Gruen-Zone 7 (mean 15.2% per year). We found no BMD loss difference between patients with cemented and uncemented prosthesis in the Gruen-Zone 2-7. In conclusion these periprosthetic losses may be due to local factors such as periprosthetic bone remodeling, as they contrast with the course of BMD in the lumbar spine, radius and not operated hip.
本研究的目的是评估假体周围骨丢失情况,并将其与身体其他部位的骨丢失进行比较。我们还旨在阐明骨水泥型股骨假体患者与非骨水泥型股骨假体患者的骨密度(BMD)变化过程。我们使用双能X线吸收法(DEXA)对连续招募的50例接受骨水泥型和非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术(THA)的患者进行了便利抽样分析。在术后第一个月以及1年后测量骨密度。在其中10例患者(20%)中发现了先前未诊断出的骨质疏松症。与非骨水泥型股骨柄患者相比,骨水泥型患者中骨质疏松症的检出率显著更高。我们发现,与身体其他部位(腰椎、桡骨、对侧髋关节)无骨量丢失相比,假体周围股骨区域的骨密度有显著下降。这种骨量丢失在Gruen 7区最为严重(平均每年15.2%)。我们发现,在Gruen 2 - 7区,骨水泥型和非骨水泥型假体患者之间的骨密度丢失没有差异。总之,这些假体周围的骨量丢失可能是由于假体周围骨重塑等局部因素导致的,因为它们与腰椎、桡骨以及未手术髋关节的骨密度变化过程不同。