Suppr超能文献

英国的急诊科没有为新出现的生物威胁和生物恐怖主义做好准备。

Emergency departments (EDs) in the United Kingdom (UK) are not prepared for emerging biological threats and bioterrorism.

作者信息

Anathallee Mohammad, Curphey Andrew, Beeching Nick, Carley Simon, Crawford Ian, Mackway-Jones Kevin

机构信息

Emergency Medicine Research Group, Department of Emergency Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.

出版信息

J Infect. 2007 Jan;54(1):12-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2006.03.034. Epub 2006 Jun 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the preparedness of emergency departments (EDs) in the United Kingdom (UK) for the management of potential biological incidents.

METHODS

We telephoned all hospitals in the UK listed as having a major ED. We surveyed their ED facilities and procedures for managing patients with infectious diseases. We determined how many of the EDs had an isolation room available and, if present, whether this had an independent ventilation system and separate access from outside the ED. In addition, we determined how many of the EDs would isolate patients with suspected cases of chickenpox, tuberculosis (TB), severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and other suspicious infections.

RESULTS

We obtained complete data from 203 (79%) of the 257 hospitals approached. Only 49 (24%) of these hospitals had isolation facilities available in the ED. Of these 49 EDs, 30 (61%) reported an independent ventilation system and 18 (37%) reported a separate access from outside the ED. The majority of EDs would isolate patients with potential infectious diseases, however, 47 (23%) would not isolate patients with suspected chickenpox, 37 (18%) EDS would not isolate patients with suspected TB, 12 (6%) EDS would not isolate patients with suspected SARS and 55 (27%) EDS would not isolate patients with other suspicious infections.

CONCLUSION

EDs in the UK are not prepared for emerging biological threats and bioterrorism. With current facilities and procedures it is highly likely that an infectious agent will spread to staff and other patients in any future biological incident.

摘要

目的

评估英国急诊科应对潜在生物事件的准备情况。

方法

我们致电英国所有列为设有大型急诊科的医院。我们调查了其急诊科管理传染病患者的设施和程序。我们确定有多少急诊科设有隔离室,若有,该隔离室是否有独立通风系统以及是否有独立于急诊科外部的通道。此外,我们确定有多少急诊科会隔离水痘疑似病例、结核病(TB)、严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)及其他可疑感染患者。

结果

我们从联系的257家医院中的203家(79%)获取了完整数据。这些医院中只有49家(24%)的急诊科设有隔离设施。在这49个急诊科中,30家(61%)报告有独立通风系统,18家(37%)报告有独立于急诊科外部的通道。大多数急诊科会隔离有潜在传染病的患者,然而,47家(23%)不会隔离水痘疑似病例,37家(18%)不会隔离结核病疑似病例,12家(6%)不会隔离SARS疑似病例,55家(27%)不会隔离其他可疑感染患者。

结论

英国的急诊科未做好应对新出现的生物威胁和生物恐怖主义的准备。以目前的设施和程序,在未来任何生物事件中,感染源极有可能传播给工作人员和其他患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4d5/7112611/2686340e10c2/fx1_lrg.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验