Waldmann Elisabeth, Britto-Arias Martha, Gessl Irina, Heinze Georg, Salzl Petra, Sallinger Daniela, Trauner Michael, Weiss Werner, Ferlitsch Arnulf, Ferlitsch Monika
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria,
Surg Endosc. 2015 Feb;29(2):466-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3688-2. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
An endoscopists adenoma detection rate (ADR) of less than 20 % correlates with high risk for occurrence of interval cancer. The impact of high-definition (HD) imaging on the ADR is discussed controversially. We aimed to investigate whether detection rates of individual endoscopists increase within 1 year before and 1 year after the switch from standard to HD endoscopy.
This cohort study analyzed 6,330 screening colonoscopies (2,968 with standard and 3,362 with HD) performed by 42 endoscopists between November 2007 and March 2013 within a nationwide quality assurance program for screening colonoscopy.
The ADR of endoscopists with a low ADR (<20 %) increased significantly higher (from 11.8 to 18.1 %, p = 0.003) than of those with a high ADR (≥ 20 %) (from 28.6 to 30.7 %, p = 0.439) after switch from standard to HD colonoscopes (p = 0.0076). The proportion of endoscopists with an ADR < 20 % decreased from 45 to 42.9 % (p = 0.593). There was no significant increase in age- and sex-adjusted detection rates of adenomas (20.2 vs 23.7 %; p = 0.089), advanced adenomas (4.7 vs 5.5 %; p = 0.479), flat adenomas (2.7 vs 3.1 %; p = 0.515), polyps (38.8 vs 41.5 %; p = 0.305), proximal polyps (18.5 vs 20 %; p = 0.469) and hyperplastic polyps (15 vs 17.2 %; p = 0.243) of endoscopists after switch to HD colonoscopes. There was no difference in detection rates of flat polyps (5.5 vs 5.5 %; p = 0.987).
The use of HD scopes is associated with marginal improvement in adenoma detection rates limited to those endoscopists with low adenoma detection rates prior to its introduction.
内镜医师腺瘤检出率(ADR)低于20%与间隔期癌发生的高风险相关。高清(HD)成像对ADR的影响存在争议。我们旨在调查从标准内镜切换到高清内镜之前1年和之后1年,个体内镜医师的腺瘤检出率是否增加。
这项队列研究分析了2007年11月至2013年3月期间42名内镜医师在全国范围内的结肠镜筛查质量保证项目中进行的6330例结肠镜筛查(2968例使用标准内镜,3362例使用高清内镜)。
ADR低(<20%)的内镜医师在从标准结肠镜切换到高清结肠镜后,其ADR显著升高(从11.8%升至18.1%,p = 0.003),高于ADR高(≥20%)的内镜医师(从28.6%升至30.7%,p = 0.439)(p = 0.0076)。ADR<20%的内镜医师比例从45%降至42.9%(p = 0.593)。切换到高清结肠镜后,内镜医师经年龄和性别调整的腺瘤检出率(20.2%对23.7%;p = 0.089)、进展性腺瘤检出率(4.7%对5.5%;p = 0.479)、扁平腺瘤检出率(2.7%对3.1%;p = 0.515)、息肉检出率(38.8%对41.5%;p = 0.305)、近端息肉检出率(18.5%对20%;p = 0.469)和增生性息肉检出率(15%对17.2%;p = 0.243)均无显著增加。扁平息肉检出率无差异(5.5%对5.5%;p = 0.987)。
使用高清内镜仅使引入高清内镜前腺瘤检出率低的内镜医师的腺瘤检出率略有提高。