Massinha Paulo, Almeida Nuno, Cunha Inês, Tomé Luís
Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra University, Coimbra, Portugal.
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2018 Sep;25(5):230-235. doi: 10.1159/000485567. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
The diagnostic acuity of colonoscopy requires a careful evaluation of the colonic mucosa, so an adequate bowel cleansing is a key element of the procedure. It is internationally recommended that an evaluation of the quality of the intestinal preparation should be included in the colonoscopy report. The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) is a bowel cleanliness rating scale that has gained some preponderance in this context. However, its application implies some degree of subjective appreciation, and it is important to conduct interobserver reproducibility studies in different contexts. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the reliability of the BBPS in the Portuguese gastroenterological community.
A prospective study involving Portuguese gastroenterologists with clinical practice in several contexts, and using different methods of evaluation of the intestinal preparation. Participants were invited to answer a questionnaire encompassing 93 static images and 12 video segments of colonoscopy examinations, with different levels of intestinal preparation. For each item, the participant gastroenterologist assigned a score of 0-3, according to the BBPS criteria. A statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 20.0 software, using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
From 45 invited gastroenterologists, 36 replied (mean age 39 ± 9 years). Fifteen (41%) had more than 10 years of colonoscopy experience and 20 (56%) performed more than 40 examinations per month. Twenty-seven (77%) usually used the BBPS in their daily practice. Statistical analysis revealed a strong interobserver correlation (ICC = 0.783) in the application of the BBPS, even in those gastroenterologists who did not use the scale in their daily routine (ICC = 0.775) and those with less years of experience (ICC = 0.820). The correlation in the videos was slightly lower than that observed in the static images (ICC = 0.74 vs. ICC = 0.78).
The application of the BBPS in the Portuguese gastroenterology community is reproducible and can represent a way to harmonize the colonoscopy reports, contributing to its correct interpretation and subsequent patient orientation.
结肠镜检查的诊断敏锐度需要对结肠黏膜进行仔细评估,因此充分的肠道清洁是该检查的关键要素。国际上建议结肠镜检查报告应包含对肠道准备质量的评估。波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)是一种在这方面已占据一定优势的肠道清洁程度评分量表。然而,其应用意味着一定程度的主观判断,在不同背景下进行观察者间再现性研究很重要。本研究的目的是评估BBPS在葡萄牙胃肠病学界的可靠性。
一项前瞻性研究,涉及在多种情况下有临床实践经验且使用不同肠道准备评估方法的葡萄牙胃肠病学家。邀请参与者回答一份包含93张静态图像和12段结肠镜检查视频片段的问卷,这些图像和视频片段展示了不同程度的肠道准备情况。对于每个项目,参与的胃肠病学家根据BBPS标准给出0 - 3分。使用SPSS 20.0软件进行统计分析,采用组内相关系数(ICC)。
在45位受邀的胃肠病学家中,36位回复(平均年龄39±9岁)。15位(41%)有超过10年的结肠镜检查经验,20位(56%)每月进行超过40次检查。27位(77%)在日常实践中通常使用BBPS。统计分析显示,即使在日常不使用该量表的胃肠病学家(ICC = 0.775)以及经验较少的胃肠病学家(ICC = 0.820)中,BBPS应用的观察者间相关性也很强(ICC = 0.783)。视频中的相关性略低于静态图像中的相关性(ICC = 0.74对ICC = 0.78)。
BBPS在葡萄牙胃肠病学界的应用具有可重复性,并且可以作为统一结肠镜检查报告的一种方式,有助于其正确解读及后续的患者指导。