• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

滤泡性淋巴瘤治疗中各种治疗方案成本因素的敏感性分析。

Sensitivity analysis of cost factors for various therapy options in the treatment of follicular lymphoma.

作者信息

Schmitz Stephan, Aly Farid, Steinmetz Tilmann, Diehl Volker, Rehwald Ute

机构信息

Hemato-Oncological Group Practice, University Hospital, Sachsenring 69, 50677 Cologne (Köln), Germany.

出版信息

Onkologie. 2006 Jun;29(6):258-64. doi: 10.1159/000093312. Epub 2006 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1159/000093312
PMID:16770087
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Germany, patients with relapsed follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma do not all receive the same treatment. In this study, 3 therapy regimens were analyzed which were considered to be similar. With the goal of determining the treatment option with the lowest direct costs whilst maintaining the same degree of effectiveness, a cost analysis model was established and applied by way of example to the existing illness constellation.

METHODS

The German doctors' fee scale (Einheitlicher Bewertungsmassstab, EBM) valid until 2005 served as the basis for the calculation of medical services within the scope of the present statutory health insurance guidelines. A virtual standard patient was constructed for the cost model and treated with the different therapy regimens. The incidences of individual adverse events described in literature served as the basis for the characterization of the average toxicity of the respective treatment methods.

RESULT

The overall costs result from the sum of the treatment costs and the toxicity-related costs. The effect of additional interventions on the overall cost was also examined.

CONCLUSION

Whereas the accompanying documentation of costs in clinical studies is organizationally complex and very tedious, the model applied here offers a reliable method of quantifying the costs of the different therapy regimens. It permits the comparison of different treatment alternatives, and it enables, by means of a cost variance analysis, the identification of cost drivers and less expensive measures within a therapy method.

摘要

背景

在德国,复发滤泡性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者并未都接受相同的治疗。在本研究中,分析了3种被认为相似的治疗方案。为了确定在保持相同疗效程度的同时直接成本最低的治疗选择,建立了一个成本分析模型,并以现有疾病情况为例进行应用。

方法

以截至2005年有效的德国医生收费标准(统一评估标准,EBM)作为在现行法定医疗保险指南范围内计算医疗服务费用的基础。为成本模型构建了一个虚拟标准患者,并采用不同治疗方案进行治疗。文献中描述的个体不良事件发生率作为各治疗方法平均毒性特征描述的基础。

结果

总成本由治疗成本和毒性相关成本之和得出。还研究了额外干预对总成本的影响。

结论

虽然临床研究中成本的附带记录在组织上很复杂且非常繁琐,但此处应用的模型提供了一种可靠的方法来量化不同治疗方案的成本。它允许比较不同的治疗选择,并通过成本差异分析,在一种治疗方法内识别成本驱动因素和成本较低的措施。

相似文献

1
Sensitivity analysis of cost factors for various therapy options in the treatment of follicular lymphoma.滤泡性淋巴瘤治疗中各种治疗方案成本因素的敏感性分析。
Onkologie. 2006 Jun;29(6):258-64. doi: 10.1159/000093312. Epub 2006 Jun 12.
2
Comparison of costs for infusion versus bolus chemotherapy administration: analysis of five standard chemotherapy regimens in three common tumors--Part one. Model projections for cost based on charges.输注化疗与大剂量化疗给药成本比较:三种常见肿瘤中五种标准化疗方案的分析——第一部分。基于收费的成本模型预测
Cancer. 1996 Jul 15;78(2):294-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960715)78:2<294::AID-CNCR16>3.0.CO;2-R.
3
Costs of drug delivery for CHOP, COP/CVP, and fludarabine: an international assessment.CHOP、COP/CVP和氟达拉滨的药物递送成本:一项国际评估。
Value Health. 2003 Mar-Apr;6(2):167-74. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2003.00227.x.
4
[Treatment of malignant non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Economic impact of rituximab (Mabthera) versus conventional chemotherapy].[恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的治疗。利妥昔单抗(美罗华)与传统化疗的经济影响]
Ann Med Interne (Paris). 2003 May;154(3):139-47.
5
Rituximab for the first-line treatment of stage III/IV follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.利妥昔单抗用于Ⅲ/Ⅳ期滤泡性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的一线治疗。
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Jun;13 Suppl 1:23-8. doi: 10.3310/hta13suppl1/04.
6
[Economic analysis of rituximab in combination with cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisolone in the treatment of patients with advanced follicular lymphoma in Portugal].[利妥昔单抗联合环磷酰胺、长春新碱和泼尼松龙治疗葡萄牙晚期滤泡性淋巴瘤患者的经济学分析]
Acta Med Port. 2010 Nov-Dec;23(6):1025-34. Epub 2010 Dec 28.
7
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bendamustine Plus Rituximab as a First-Line Treatment for Patients with Follicular Lymphoma in Spain.苯达莫司汀联合利妥昔单抗作为西班牙滤泡性淋巴瘤患者一线治疗方案的成本效益分析
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016 Aug;14(4):465-477. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0243-4.
8
Costs of chemotherapy for indolent follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the UK: an observational study.
Acta Haematol. 2006;115(1-2):28-34. doi: 10.1159/000089462.
9
Cost-effectiveness of extended adjuvant rituximab for US patients aged 65-70 years with follicular lymphoma in second remission.对于处于第二次缓解期的65 - 70岁美国滤泡性淋巴瘤患者,延长辅助使用利妥昔单抗的成本效益分析。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. 2008 Jun;8(3):166-70. doi: 10.3816/CLM.2008.n.020.
10
Cost-effectiveness of maintenance rituximab treatment after second line therapy in patients with follicular lymphoma in Sweden.瑞典滤泡性淋巴瘤患者二线治疗后利妥昔单抗维持治疗的成本效益
Acta Oncol. 2008;47(6):1029-36. doi: 10.1080/02841860802120028.

引用本文的文献

1
Retrospective analysis of first-line treatment for follicular lymphoma based on outcomes and medical economics.基于疗效和医学经济学的滤泡性淋巴瘤一线治疗的回顾性分析。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr;23(2):375-381. doi: 10.1007/s10147-017-1202-2. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
2
Economic burden of follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.滤泡性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的经济负担
Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(8):657-79. doi: 10.2165/11314820-000000000-00000.
3
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma: retrospective study on the cost-effectiveness of early treatment response assessment by FDG-PET.
非霍奇金淋巴瘤:关于通过氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描进行早期治疗反应评估的成本效益的回顾性研究。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008 Jun;35(6):1074-80. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0690-0. Epub 2008 Jan 25.