• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国急诊科救护车转运情况的全国性研究:心理健康问题的重要性

National study of ambulance transports to United States emergency departments: importance of mental health problems.

作者信息

Larkin Gregory Luke, Claassen Cynthia A, Pelletier Andrea J, Camargo Carlos A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390-8579, USA.

出版信息

Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006 Mar-Apr;21(2):82-90. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x0000340x.

DOI:10.1017/s1049023x0000340x
PMID:16770997
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Understanding ambulance utilization patterns is essential to assessing prehospital system capacity and preparedness at the national level.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the characteristics of patients transported to U.S. emergency departments (EDs) by ambulance and to determine predictors of ambulance utilization.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey using mode of arrival, demographic and visit information, ICD-9-CM E and V-codes, and classified reasons for the visit.

RESULTS

The rates for ED visits of persons conveyed by ambulence were stable between 1997 and 2003, consisting of approximately one in every seven ED visits (14%). In 2003, there were 16.2 million ED visits for which an ambulance was used in the U.S. However, for patients with mental health visits, nearly one in three ED presentations (31%) arrived by ambulance. Significantly higher rates of ambulance use were associated with: (1) mental health visits; (2) older age; (3) African-Americans; (4) Medicare or self-pay insurance status; (5) urban ED location; (6) U.S. regions outside of the South; (7) presentation between 12 midnight to 0800 hours; (8) injury-related visits; (9) urgent visit status; and/or (10) those resulting in hospital admission. Among mental health patients, older age, self-pay insurance status, urban ED location, regions outside the southern US, and urgent visit classification predicted ambulance use. Ambulance usage within the mental health group was highest for suicide and lowest for mood and anxiety disorder-related visits.

CONCLUSION

Reliance on ambulance services varies by age, insurance status, geographic factors, time of day, urgency of visit, subsequent admission status, and type of mental health disorder. Even after controlling for many confounding factors, mental health problems remain an important predictor of ambulance use.

摘要

引言

了解救护车使用模式对于评估国家层面的院前系统能力和准备情况至关重要。

目的

描述通过救护车转运至美国急诊科(ED)的患者特征,并确定救护车使用的预测因素。

方法

数据来自国家医院门诊医疗调查,使用到达方式、人口统计学和就诊信息、ICD-9-CM E和V编码以及就诊分类原因。

结果

1997年至2003年间,由救护车运送的人员到急诊科就诊的比例稳定,约占每七次急诊科就诊中的一次(14%)。2003年,美国有1620万次急诊科就诊使用了救护车。然而,对于心理健康就诊患者,近三分之一的急诊科就诊(31%)是乘坐救护车到达的。救护车使用比例显著较高与以下因素相关:(1)心理健康就诊;(2)年龄较大;(3)非裔美国人;(4)医疗保险或自费保险状况;(5)城市急诊科位置;(6)美国南部以外的地区;(7)午夜12点至早上8点就诊;(8)与损伤相关的就诊;(9)紧急就诊状态;和/或(10)导致住院的就诊。在心理健康患者中,年龄较大、自费保险状况、城市急诊科位置、美国南部以外的地区以及紧急就诊分类可预测救护车使用情况。心理健康组中,自杀患者的救护车使用率最高,情绪和焦虑障碍相关就诊患者的使用率最低。

结论

对救护车服务的依赖因年龄、保险状况、地理因素、就诊时间、就诊紧急程度、后续住院状况以及心理健康障碍类型而异。即使在控制了许多混杂因素之后,心理健康问题仍然是救护车使用的重要预测因素。

相似文献

1
National study of ambulance transports to United States emergency departments: importance of mental health problems.美国急诊科救护车转运情况的全国性研究:心理健康问题的重要性
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006 Mar-Apr;21(2):82-90. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x0000340x.
2
Analysis of ambulance transports and diversions among US emergency departments.美国急诊科救护车转运与分流情况分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Apr;47(4):317-26. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.12.001. Epub 2006 Feb 17.
3
Trends in Emergency Department Use by Rural and Urban Populations in the United States.美国农村和城市人口急诊就诊趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e191919. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1919.
4
Trends in U.S. emergency department visits for anxiety-related mental health conditions, 1992-2001.1992 - 2001年美国急诊科因焦虑相关心理健康状况就诊的趋势。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;69(2):286-94. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0215.
5
Geographic Variation in Use of Ambulance Transport to the Emergency Department.使用救护车转运至急诊科的地理差异。
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;70(4):533-543.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.03.029. Epub 2017 May 27.
6
Changes in insurance status and emergency department visits after the 2008 economic downturn.2008年经济衰退后保险状况及急诊科就诊情况的变化。
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;22(1):73-80. doi: 10.1111/acem.12553. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
7
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1999 emergency department summary.国家医院门诊医疗护理调查:1999年急诊科总结
Adv Data. 2001 Jun 25(320):1-34.
8
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2005 emergency department summary.国家医院门诊医疗调查:2005年急诊科总结
Adv Data. 2007 Jun 29(386):1-32.
9
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 emergency department summary.国家医院门诊医疗护理调查:2006年急诊科总结
Natl Health Stat Report. 2008 Aug 6(7):1-38.
10
Emergency medical services system utilization over the last 10 years: what predicts transport of children?过去10年急诊医疗服务系统的使用情况:哪些因素能预测儿童被转运?
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015 May;31(5):321-6. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000419.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with refusal of transport to hospital among patients experiencing suicidal crisis in South Korea.韩国自杀危机患者中与拒绝送往医院相关的因素。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 25;10(20):e38451. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38451. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.
2
Exploring the reliability and profile of frequent mental health presentations using different methods: An observational study using statewide ambulance data over a 4-year period.运用不同方法探究常见心理健康问题的可靠性及特征:一项基于四年全州救护车数据的观察性研究。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2025 Jan;59(1):74-85. doi: 10.1177/00048674241289016. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
3
EMS Responses for Pediatric Behavioral Health Emergencies in the United States: A 4-Year Descriptive Evaluation.
美国儿科行为健康紧急事件的急救反应:一项为期四年的描述性评估。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2023 Dec;38(6):784-791. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X2300657X. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
4
Safety of a prehospital emergency medical services protocol for an alternative destination for pediatric behavioral emergencies in Alameda County.阿拉米达县针对儿科行为紧急情况的替代目的地的院前紧急医疗服务协议的安全性。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2023 Apr 9;4(2):e12930. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12930. eCollection 2023 Apr.
5
Factors predicting admission of psychiatric emergency contacts after presenting to the emergency department: results of a regression analysis.急诊科就诊后精神科紧急联系人入院的预测因素:回归分析结果
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 9;21(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12991-022-00421-2.
6
Mental health emergencies attended by ambulances in the United Kingdom and the implications for health service delivery: A cross-sectional study.英国救护车处理的心理健康紧急情况及其对卫生服务提供的影响:一项横断面研究。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2023 Apr;28(2):138-146. doi: 10.1177/13558196221119913. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
7
Strengthening Behavioral Health Services Through Partnerships and Data Integration.通过伙伴关系和数据整合加强行为健康服务。
Cureus. 2022 May 11;14(5):e24929. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24929. eCollection 2022 May.
8
Economic burden of pediatric prescription opioid poisonings in the United States.美国儿童处方类阿片中毒的经济负担。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Jan;27(1):16-26. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.1.016.
9
Characteristics and outcome of patients triaged by telephone and transported by ambulance: a population-based study in Osaka, Japan.通过电话分诊并由救护车转运的患者的特征与结局:日本大阪的一项基于人群的研究
Acute Med Surg. 2020 Nov 28;7(1):e609. doi: 10.1002/ams2.609. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
10
Interfacility ambulance transport of mental health patients.心理健康患者的机构间救护车转运。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Feb 8;1(3):173-182. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12012. eCollection 2020 Jun.