Hanchate Amresh D, Paasche-Orlow Michael K, Dyer K Sophia, Baker William E, Feng Chen, Feldman James
VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA; Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;70(4):533-543.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.03.029. Epub 2017 May 27.
Evidence on variability in emergency medical services use is limited. We obtain national evidence on geographic variation in the use of ambulance transport to the emergency department (ED) among Medicare enrollees and assess the role of health status, socioeconomic status, and provider availability.
We used 2010 Medicare claims data for a random sample of 999,999 enrollees aged 66 years and older, and identified ambulance transport and ED use. The main outcome measures were number of ambulance transports to the ED per 100 person-years (ambulance transport rate) and proportion (percentage) of ED visits by ambulance transport by hospital referral regions.
The national ambulance transport rate was 22.2 and the overall proportion of ED visits by ambulance was 36.7%. Relative to hospital referral regions in the lowest rate quartile, those in the highest quartile had a 75% higher ambulance transport rate (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.69 to 1.81) and a 15.5% higher proportion of ED visits by ambulance (IRR 1.155; 95% CI 1.146 to 1.164). Adjusting for health status, socioeconomic status, and provider availability reduced quartile 1 versus quartile 4 difference in ambulance transport rate by 43% (IRR 1.43; 95% CI 1.38 to 1.48) and proportion of ED visits by ambulance by 7% (IRR 1.145; 95% CI 1.135 to 1.155). Among the 3 covariate domains, health status was associated with the largest variability in ambulance transport rate (30.1%), followed by socioeconomic status (12.8%) and provider availability (2.9%).
Geographic variability in ambulance use is large and associated with variation in patient health status and socioeconomic status.
关于急诊医疗服务使用情况变异性的证据有限。我们获取了医疗保险参保人中使用救护车转运至急诊科(ED)的地理差异的全国性证据,并评估健康状况、社会经济地位和医疗服务提供者可及性的作用。
我们使用了2010年医疗保险索赔数据,对999,999名66岁及以上的参保人进行随机抽样,并确定了救护车转运和急诊科使用情况。主要结局指标是每100人年的救护车转运至急诊科的次数(救护车转运率)以及按医院转诊区域划分的通过救护车转运进行的急诊科就诊比例(百分比)。
全国救护车转运率为22.2,通过救护车进行的急诊科就诊的总体比例为36.7%。与最低率四分位数的医院转诊区域相比,最高四分位数的区域救护车转运率高75%(发病率比值[IRR] 1.75;95%置信区间[CI] 1.69至1.81),通过救护车进行的急诊科就诊比例高15.5%(IRR 1.155;95% CI 1.146至1.164)。对健康状况、社会经济地位和医疗服务提供者可及性进行调整后,第一四分位数与第四四分位数在救护车转运率方面的差异减少了43%(IRR 1.43;95% CI 1.38至1.48),通过救护车进行的急诊科就诊比例差异减少了7%(IRR 1.145;95% CI 1.135至1.155)。在这三个协变量领域中,健康状况与救护车转运率的变异性最大相关(30.1%),其次是社会经济地位(12.8%)和医疗服务提供者可及性(2.9%)。
救护车使用的地理变异性很大,且与患者健康状况和社会经济地位的差异相关。