• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2005年查尔斯·F·普伦蒂斯奖讲座:人眼的光学:进展与问题

The Charles F. Prentice Award Lecture 2005: optics of the human eye: progress and problems.

作者信息

Charman W Neil

机构信息

Optometry and Neuroscience, School of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Jun;83(6):335-45. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000221389.36278.d0.

DOI:10.1097/01.opx.0000221389.36278.d0
PMID:16772891
Abstract

The history of measurements of ocular aberration is briefly reviewed and recent work using much-improved aberrometers and large samples of eyes is summarized. When on-axis, higher-order, monochromatic aberrations are averaged, undercorrected, positive, fourth-order spherical aberration dominates; other Zernike wavefront aberration coefficients have average values near zero. Individually, however, many eyes show substantial amounts of third-order and other fourth-order aberrations; the value of these varies idiosyncratically about zero. Most normal eyes show only small amounts of axial monochromatic aberration for photopic pupils up to around 3 mm; the limits to retinal image quality are then usually set by diffraction, uncorrected or imperfectly corrected spherocylindrical refractive error, accommodation error, and chromatic aberration. Longitudinal chromatic aberration varies very little across the population. With larger mesopic and scotopic pupils, monochromatic aberration plays a more important optical role, but overall visual performance is increasingly dominated by neural factors. Some remaining problems in measuring and modeling the eye's optical performance are discussed.

摘要

本文简要回顾了眼像差测量的历史,并总结了近期使用大幅改进的像差仪和大量眼睛样本所开展的工作。当测量轴上高阶单色像差的平均值时,欠矫正的正性四阶球差占主导地位;其他泽尼克波前像差系数的平均值接近零。然而,就个体而言,许多眼睛表现出大量的三阶和其他四阶像差;这些像差的值围绕零呈特异变化。对于直径达3mm左右的明视瞳孔,大多数正常眼睛仅表现出少量的轴向单色像差;此时视网膜图像质量的限制通常由衍射、未矫正或矫正不完善的球柱面屈光不正、调节误差和色差决定。纵向色差在人群中的变化非常小。对于较大的中间视觉和暗视觉瞳孔,单色像差起着更重要的光学作用,但总体视觉性能越来越受神经因素主导。本文还讨论了在测量和模拟眼睛光学性能方面仍然存在的一些问题。

相似文献

1
The Charles F. Prentice Award Lecture 2005: optics of the human eye: progress and problems.2005年查尔斯·F·普伦蒂斯奖讲座:人眼的光学:进展与问题
Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Jun;83(6):335-45. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000221389.36278.d0.
2
Wave aberration of human eyes and new descriptors of image optical quality and visual performance.人眼波像差和新的像质与视觉性能评价指标。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Feb;36(2):313-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.09.026.
3
Statistical variation of aberration structure and image quality in a normal population of healthy eyes.正常健康人群眼睛像差结构和图像质量的统计变化
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2002 Dec;19(12):2329-48. doi: 10.1364/josaa.19.002329.
4
Age-related changes in ocular aberrations with accommodation.随着调节作用,眼像差的年龄相关性变化。
J Vis. 2007 May 30;7(7):11.1-21. doi: 10.1167/7.7.11.
5
The 2012 Charles Prentice medal lecture: wavefront measurement of refractive state.2012年查尔斯·普伦蒂斯奖章讲座:屈光状态的波前测量
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Sep;90(9):911-23. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000014.
6
The prediction of spherical aberration with schematic eyes.用简化眼预测球差。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996 Jul;16(4):348-54.
7
Monochromatic aberrations of the human eye and myopia.人眼的单色像差与近视
Clin Exp Optom. 2009 May;92(3):304-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2009.00378.x.
8
Construction of special eye models for investigation of chromatic and higher-order aberrations of eyes.用于研究眼睛色像差和高阶像差的特殊眼睛模型的构建。
Biomed Mater Eng. 2014;24(6):3073-81. doi: 10.3233/BME-141129.
9
[Quantitative assessment of quality of vision].[视力质量的定量评估]
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2004 Dec;108(12):770-807; discussion 808.
10
Optical aberrations in the mouse eye.小鼠眼睛中的光学像差。
Vision Res. 2006 Aug;46(16):2546-53. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.01.011. Epub 2006 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing habitual and i. Scription refractions.比较习惯性验光和综合验光仪验光结果。 (注:原文“i. Scription refractions”可能有误,推测为“instrument refractions”,若有误请以实际为准,这里按推测翻译)
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb 12;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1053-x.
2
Comparison of Subjective Refraction under Binocular and Monocular Conditions in Myopic Subjects.近视患者双眼和单眼条件下主观验光的比较。
Sci Rep. 2015 Jul 28;5:12606. doi: 10.1038/srep12606.