Suppr超能文献

慢性脊髓损伤患者中缓释氨吡啶的2期试验。

Phase 2 trial of sustained-release fampridine in chronic spinal cord injury.

作者信息

Cardenas D D, Ditunno J, Graziani V, Jackson A B, Lammertse D, Potter P, Sipski M, Cohen R, Blight A R

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Spinal Cord. 2007 Feb;45(2):158-68. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101947. Epub 2006 Jun 13.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE

Assess safety and efficacy of sustained-release fampridine in subjects with chronic spinal cord injury.

SETTING

A total of 11 academic rehabilitation research centers in the United States.

METHODS

A total of 91 subjects with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI), randomized to three arms: fampridine, sustained release, 25 mg b.i.d. (Group I), 40 mg b.i.d. (Group II), and placebo (Group III) for 8 weeks.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient diary questionnaire, Ashworth score, American Spinal Cord Injury Association International Standards, International Index of Erectile Function, bladder and bowel management questionnaires, and Clinician and Subject Global Impressions (Clinician Global Impression of change, Subject Global Impression (SGI)). Safety was evaluated from adverse events, physical examinations, vital signs, electrocardiograms, and laboratory tests.

RESULTS

In total, 78% of the subjects completed the study. More (13/30) discontinued from Group II than Group I (4/30) and Group III (3/31). The most frequent adverse events across groups were hypertonia, generalized spasm, insomnia, dizziness, asthenia, pain, constipation, and headache. One subject in Group II experienced a seizure. SGI changed significantly in favor of Group I (P=0.02). Subgroup analysis of subjects with baseline Ashworth scores >1 showed significant improvement in spasticity in Group I versus III (P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Group I showed significant improvement in SGI, and potential benefit on spasticity. The drug was well tolerated. Group II showed more adverse events and discontinuations.

摘要

研究设计

双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、平行组临床试验。

目的

评估缓释氨吡啶对慢性脊髓损伤患者的安全性和疗效。

地点

美国总共11个学术康复研究中心。

方法

总共91例运动不完全性脊髓损伤(SCI)患者,随机分为三组:氨吡啶缓释片25毫克,每日两次(第一组)、40毫克,每日两次(第二组)和安慰剂组(第三组),治疗8周。

观察指标

患者日记问卷、Ashworth评分、美国脊髓损伤协会国际标准、国际勃起功能指数、膀胱和肠道管理问卷以及临床医生和患者整体印象(临床医生对变化的整体印象、患者整体印象(PGI))。通过不良事件、体格检查、生命体征、心电图和实验室检查评估安全性。

结果

总共78%的受试者完成了研究。第二组(13/30)退出研究的人数多于第一组(4/30)和第三组(3/31)。各组最常见的不良事件为张力亢进、全身性痉挛、失眠、头晕、乏力、疼痛、便秘和头痛。第二组有一名受试者发生癫痫。患者整体印象有显著变化,有利于第一组(P = 0.02)。对基线Ashworth评分>1的受试者进行亚组分析显示,第一组与第三组相比,痉挛有显著改善(P = 0.02)。

结论

第一组在患者整体印象方面有显著改善,对痉挛有潜在益处。该药物耐受性良好。第二组出现更多不良事件和退出研究的情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验