Campbell Rose, Ash Joan
Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, USA.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:101-5.
There are a number of electronic products designed to provide information at the point of care. These bedside information tools can facilitate the practice of Evidence Based Medicine. This paper evaluates five of these products using user-centered and task-oriented methods. Twenty-four users of these products were asked to attempt to answer clinical questions using a variety of products. The proportion of questions answered, time spent searching and user satisfaction were measured for each product. Results show that proportion of questions answered and time spent searching was not necessarily correlated with user satisfaction with a product. When evaluating electronic products designed for use at the point of care, the user interaction aspects of a product become as important as more traditional content-based measures of quality. Actual or potential users of such products are in the pest position to identify which products rate the best in these measures.
有许多旨在提供即时医疗信息的电子产品。这些床边信息工具有助于循证医学的实践。本文采用以用户为中心和面向任务的方法对其中五种产品进行评估。要求使用这些产品的24名用户尝试使用各种产品回答临床问题。测量了每种产品回答问题的比例、搜索时间和用户满意度。结果表明，回答问题的比例和搜索时间不一定与用户对产品的满意度相关。在评估为即时医疗设计的电子产品时，产品的用户交互方面与更传统的基于内容的质量衡量标准同样重要。此类产品的实际或潜在用户最有资格确定哪些产品在这些衡量标准中评分最高。
