• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共生关系进化的一般模型。

A general model for the evolution of mutualisms.

作者信息

Foster K R, Wenseleers T

机构信息

Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin, Institute for Advanced Study, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

J Evol Biol. 2006 Jul;19(4):1283-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.01073.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.01073.x
PMID:16780529
Abstract

The evolution of mutualisms presents a puzzle. Why does selection favour cooperation among species rather than cheaters that accept benefits but provide nothing in return? Here we present a general model that predicts three key factors will be important in mutualism evolution: (i) high benefit to cost ratio, (ii) high within-species relatedness and (iii) high between-species fidelity. These factors operate by moderating three types of feedback benefit from mutualism: cooperator association, partner-fidelity feedback and partner choice. In defining the relationship between these processes, our model also allows an assessment of their relative importance. Importantly, the model suggests that phenotypic feedbacks (partner-fidelity feedback, partner choice) are a more important explanation for between-species cooperation than the development of genetic correlations among species (cooperator association). We explain the relationship of our model to existing theories and discuss the empirical evidence for our predictions.

摘要

互利共生的进化存在一个谜题。为什么自然选择更青睐物种间的合作,而非那些接受益处却不提供任何回报的欺骗者呢?在此,我们提出一个通用模型,该模型预测在互利共生进化中三个关键因素将至关重要:(i)高收益成本比,(ii)物种内的高亲缘关系,以及(iii)物种间的高忠诚度。这些因素通过调节互利共生的三种反馈益处来发挥作用:合作者关联、伙伴忠诚度反馈和伙伴选择。在定义这些过程之间的关系时,我们的模型还允许对它们的相对重要性进行评估。重要的是,该模型表明表型反馈(伙伴忠诚度反馈、伙伴选择)比物种间遗传相关性的发展(合作者关联)更能解释物种间的合作。我们解释了我们的模型与现有理论的关系,并讨论了支持我们预测的实证证据。

相似文献

1
A general model for the evolution of mutualisms.共生关系进化的一般模型。
J Evol Biol. 2006 Jul;19(4):1283-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.01073.x.
2
Genetics of mutualism: the evolution of altruism between species.共生的遗传学:物种间利他行为的进化
J Theor Biol. 1994 Oct 21;170(4):393-400. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1994.1200.
3
Non-mutualistic yucca moths and their evolutionary consequences.非互利共生的丝兰蛾及其进化后果。
Nature. 1996 Mar 14;380(6570):155-6. doi: 10.1038/380155a0.
4
Coevolution in variable mutualisms.可变互利共生中的协同进化。
Am Nat. 2003 Oct;162(4 Suppl):S80-93. doi: 10.1086/378705.
5
Let the right one in: a microeconomic approach to partner choice in mutualisms.让合适的一方进入:互惠共生中伴侣选择的微观经济学方法。
Am Nat. 2011 Jan;177(1):75-85. doi: 10.1086/657622. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
6
Acknowledging selection at sub-organismal levels resolves controversy on pro-cooperation mechanisms.认识到亚生物体层面的选择解决了关于合作促进机制的争议。
Elife. 2015 Dec 29;4:e10106. doi: 10.7554/eLife.10106.
7
Life-history differences among coral reef sponges promote mutualism or exploitation of mutualism by influencing partner fidelity feedback.珊瑚礁海绵之间的生活史差异通过影响伙伴忠诚度反馈来促进共生或对共生关系的利用。
Am Nat. 2008 May;171(5):597-609. doi: 10.1086/587067.
8
Phytophagous insect-microbe mutualisms and adaptive evolutionary diversification.植食性昆虫与微生物的共生关系及适应性进化多样化
Evolution. 2008 May;62(5):997-1012. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00348.x. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
9
The evolution of mutualism.互利共生的进化。
J Evol Biol. 2010 Dec;23(12):2507-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02114.x. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
10
The evolution of cooperation and altruism--a general framework and a classification of models.合作与利他行为的演化——一个通用框架及模型分类
J Evol Biol. 2006 Sep;19(5):1365-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01119.x.

引用本文的文献

1
From friend to foe and back: coevolutionary transitions in the mutualism-antagonism continuum.从朋友到敌人再回归:共生-对抗连续体中的协同进化转变
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Jul;292(2051):20242326. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2326. Epub 2025 Jul 23.
2
The chemical interaction between plants and the rhizosphere microbiome.植物与根际微生物群落之间的化学相互作用。
Trends Plant Sci. 2025 Sep;30(9):1002-1019. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2025.06.001. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
3
From the inside out: Were the cuticular bacteria of fungus-farming ants originally domesticated as gut symbionts?
由内而外:真菌培育蚁的表皮细菌最初是作为肠道共生体被驯化的吗?
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Oct 15;3(10):pgae391. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae391. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Invasions of Host-Associated Microbiome Networks.宿主相关微生物群落网络的入侵
Adv Ecol Res. 2017;57:201-281. doi: 10.1016/bs.aecr.2016.11.002.
5
Higher-order interactions and emergent properties of microbial communities: The power of synthetic ecology.微生物群落的高阶相互作用和涌现特性:合成生态学的力量。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 9;10(14):e33896. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33896. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
6
The presence of territorial damselfish predicts choosy client species richness at cleaning stations.领地性雀鲷的存在预示着清洁站中挑剔的客户物种丰富度。
Behav Ecol. 2023 Feb 21;34(2):269-277. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arac122. eCollection 2023 Mar-Apr.
7
Co-diversification of an intestinal Mycoplasma and its salmonid host.肠道支原体与其鲑科宿主的共同多样化。
ISME J. 2023 May;17(5):682-692. doi: 10.1038/s41396-023-01379-z. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
8
Genetic Covariation Between the Vertically Transmitted Endophyte Epichloë canadensis and Its Host Canada Wildrye.内生真菌 Epichloë canadensis 与其宿主加拿大野黑麦的垂直传播遗传变异。
Microb Ecol. 2023 Oct;86(3):1686-1695. doi: 10.1007/s00248-022-02166-7. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
9
Foraging synchrony drives resilience in human-dolphin mutualism.觅食同步驱动人类与海豚共生关系的恢复力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Feb 7;120(6):e2207739120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2207739120. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
10
Microbial warfare and the evolution of symbiosis.微生物战争与共生关系的进化。
Biol Lett. 2022 Dec;18(12):20220447. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0447. Epub 2022 Dec 21.