Suppr超能文献

3d过渡金属化学中密度泛函方法的比较评估。

Comparative assessment of density functional methods for 3d transition-metal chemistry.

作者信息

Zhao Yan, Truhlar Donald G

机构信息

Department of Chemistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0431, USA.

出版信息

J Chem Phys. 2006 Jun 14;124(22):224105. doi: 10.1063/1.2202732.

Abstract

In the present study, we comparatively assessed the newly developed M05 functional against a data set of reaction energies for transition-metal chemistry. The functionals to which we compare are BLYP, B3LYP, B97-2, MPWLYP1M, TPSS, and TPSSh. We draw the following conclusions: (1) TPSS gives the best performance for calculating the binding energies of three transition-metal dimers (Sc(2), Ni(2), and V(2)) that have severe multireference character, (2) B97-2 gives the best performance for calculating the binding energies of the nine metal-ligand diatomics (three monohydrides, three monoxide, and three monofluorides), and (3) M05 gives the overall best performance for all 18 data in the assessment, and it has a mean unsigned error 55% lower than the popular B3LYP functional. Since the M05 functional also gives good performance for main-group thermochemistry, for noncovalent chemistry, and for calculating barrier heights, M05 can be applied to a wide range of problems where nonhybrid functionals or functionals designed for kinetics fail.

摘要

在本研究中,我们针对一组过渡金属化学的反应能量数据集,对新开发的M05泛函进行了比较评估。我们所比较的泛函有BLYP、B3LYP、B97 - 2、MPWLYP1M、TPSS和TPSSh。我们得出以下结论:(1)对于具有严重多参考特征的三种过渡金属二聚体(Sc(2)、Ni(2)和V(2))的结合能计算,TPSS表现最佳;(2)对于九种金属 - 配体双原子分子(三种一氢化物、三种一氧化碳和三种一氟化物)的结合能计算,B97 - 2表现最佳;(3)对于评估中的所有18个数据,M05的整体表现最佳,其平均绝对误差比常用的B3LYP泛函低55%。由于M05泛函在主族热化学、非共价化学以及计算势垒高度方面也表现良好,因此M05可应用于广泛的问题,在这些问题中,非杂化泛函或为动力学设计的泛函无法适用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验