Shiekh Bilal Ahmad
Department of Chemistry, UGC Sponsored Centre of Advanced Studies-II, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar 143005, India.
ACS Omega. 2019 Sep 13;4(13):15435-15443. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b01563. eCollection 2019 Sep 24.
The accuracy and reliability of 17 commonly used density functionals in conjunction with Poisson-Boltzmann finite solvation model were gauged for predicting the free energy of Rh(I)- and Rh(III)-mediated chemical transformations such as ligand exchange, hydride elimination, dihydrogen elimination, chloride affinity, and silyl hydride bond activation reactions. In total, six Rh-mediated reactions were examined, and the computed density functional theory results were then subjected to comparison with the experimentally reported values. For reaction A, involving replacement of N with η-H over Rh(I), MPWB1K-D3, B3PW91, B3LYP, and BHandHYLP emerged to be the best functionals of all the tested methods in terms of their deviations ≤2 kcal mol from experimental data. For reaction B, in which exchange of η-CH with N over Rh(I) takes place, MPWB1K-D3 and M06-2X-D3 functionals performed the best, while as for reaction C (hydride elimination reaction in Rh(III) complex), it is PBE functional that showed impressive performance. Similarly, for reaction D (H elimination reaction in Rh(III) complex), PBE0-D3 and PBE-D3 showed exceptional results compared to other functionals. For reaction E (HO/Cl exchange), the PBE0 again shows impressive performance as compared to other functionals. For reaction F (Si-H activation), M06-2X-D3, PBE0-D3, and MPWB1K-D3 functionals are undoubtedly the best functionals. Overall, PBE0-D3 and MPWB1K-D3 functionals were impressive in all cases with lowest mean unsigned errors (3.2 and 3.4 kcal mol, respectively) with respect to experimental Gibbs free energies. Thus, these two functionals are recommended for studying Rh-mediated chemical transformations.
结合泊松-玻尔兹曼有限溶剂化模型,对17种常用密度泛函在预测Rh(I)和Rh(III)介导的化学转化(如配体交换、氢化物消除、二氢消除、氯亲和力和硅氢化键活化反应)的自由能方面的准确性和可靠性进行了评估。总共研究了六个Rh介导的反应,然后将计算得到的密度泛函理论结果与实验报告值进行比较。对于反应A,涉及Rh(I)上的N被η-H取代,在所有测试方法中,MPWB1K-D3、B3PW91、B3LYP和BHandHYLP因其与实验数据的偏差≤2 kcal/mol而成为最佳泛函。对于反应B,其中Rh(I)上的η-CH与N发生交换,MPWB1K-D3和M06-2X-D3泛函表现最佳,而对于反应C(Rh(III)配合物中的氢化物消除反应),PBE泛函表现出色。同样,对于反应D(Rh(III)配合物中的H消除反应),与其他泛函相比,PBE0-D3和PBE-D3表现出优异的结果。对于反应E(HO/Cl交换),与其他泛函相比,PBE0再次表现出色。对于反应F(Si-H活化),M06-2X-D3、PBE0-D3和MPWB1K-D3泛函无疑是最佳泛函。总体而言,PBE0-D3和MPWB1K-D3泛函在所有情况下都令人印象深刻,相对于实验吉布斯自由能,其平均无符号误差最低(分别为3.2和3.4 kcal/mol)。因此,推荐这两种泛函用于研究Rh介导的化学转化。