Suppr超能文献

化疗引起的周围神经毒性的总神经病变评分的多中心评估。

Multi-center assessment of the Total Neuropathy Score for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity.

作者信息

Cavaletti Guido, Jann Stefano, Pace Andrea, Plasmati Rosaria, Siciliano Gabriele, Briani Chiara, Cocito Dario, Padua Luca, Ghiglione Elisabetta, Manicone Mariagrazia, Giussani Giuditta

机构信息

Department of Neurosciences and Biomedical Technologies, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2006 Jun;11(2):135-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1085-9489.2006.00078.x.

Abstract

The aim of this multi-center study was to assess with reduced versions of the Total Neuropathy Score (TNS), the severity of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN), and to compare the results with those obtained with common toxicity scales. An unselected population of 428 cancer patients was evaluated at 11 different centers using a composite (clinical + neurophysiological, TNSr) or clinical (TNSc) examination and with the National Cancer Institute - Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) 2.0 and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores. A highly significant correlation was demonstrated between the TNSr and the NCI-CTC 2.0 and ECOG scores; but the TNSr evaluation was more accurate in view of the more extended score range. Also, the simpler and faster TNSc (based only on the clinical neurological examination) allowed to grade accurately CIPN and correlated with the common toxicity scores. The correlation tended to be closer when the sensory items were considered, but also the TNSr motor items, which were not specifically investigated in any other previous study, significantly correlated with the results of the common toxicity scales. In conclusion, this study suggests that the TNSr is a reliable tool for accurately grading and reporting CIPN, with the additional and so far unique support of a formal comparison with known and widely used common toxicity scales. The TNSc is a valid alternative if neurophysiological examination is not feasible. The longer time needed to calculate the TNSr and TNSc in comparison to the ECOG or the NCI-CTC 2.0 scales is offset by the more detailed knowledge of the CIPN characteristics.

摘要

这项多中心研究的目的是使用简化版的总神经病变评分(TNS)评估化疗引起的周围神经毒性(CIPN)的严重程度,并将结果与使用常见毒性量表获得的结果进行比较。在11个不同中心对428名未经过筛选的癌症患者进行了评估,采用综合(临床+神经生理学,TNSr)或临床(TNSc)检查,并使用美国国立癌症研究所通用毒性标准(NCI-CTC)2.0和东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)评分。TNSr与NCI-CTC 2.0和ECOG评分之间显示出高度显著的相关性;但鉴于TNSr评分范围更广,其评估更为准确。此外,更简单快捷的TNSc(仅基于临床神经学检查)能够准确分级CIPN,并与常见毒性评分相关。当考虑感觉项目时,相关性往往更紧密,但此前任何其他研究均未专门研究的TNSr运动项目也与常见毒性量表的结果显著相关。总之,本研究表明,TNSr是准确分级和报告CIPN的可靠工具,并且与已知且广泛使用的常见毒性量表进行正式比较提供了额外且迄今为止独一无二的支持。如果神经生理学检查不可行,TNSc是一种有效的替代方法。与ECOG或NCI-CTC 2.0量表相比,计算TNSr和TNSc所需的时间更长,但对CIPN特征更详细的了解弥补了这一不足。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验