Suppr超能文献

与浸渍法相比,采用加压液体萃取法从鱼藤和马来鱼藤中提取鱼藤酮。

Extraction of rotenone from Derris elliptica and Derris malaccensis by pressurized liquid extraction compared with maceration.

作者信息

Sae-Yun Attawadee, Ovatlarnporn Chitchamai, Itharat Arunporn, Wiwattanapatapee Ruedeekorn

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90112, Thailand.

出版信息

J Chromatogr A. 2006 Sep 1;1125(2):172-6. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.05.075. Epub 2006 Jun 19.

Abstract

The extraction of active compounds from plants is one of the most critical steps in the commercial development of natural products for medicinal, herbicidal or pesticidal use. The focus of this study was to compare conventional maceration and pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) techniques for the efficient extraction of rotenone from the stem and root of Derris elliptica Benth and Derris malaccensis Prain. The effects of experimental variables, such as solvent, temperature and pressure, on PLE efficiency have been studied. Chloroform was determined to be a good extraction solvent (rotenone content 40.6%, w/w) compared to commonly used solvent, 95% ethanol (rotenone content 15.0%, w/w). The optimal conditions for PLE were 50 degrees C and 2000 psi. PLE showed higher extraction efficiency (rotenone content 46.1%, w/w) as compared with conventional maceration method (rotenone content 40.6%, w/w). The order of rotenone content found in crude extract obtained by optimized method from the highest to the lowest was root (46.1%, w/w) and stem (9.4%, w/w) of D. elliptica and stem of D. malaccensis (5.2%, w/w), respectively. Moreover, the results from this study indicated that PLE was considerably less time and solvent consuming (30 min, 3 ml/g of dried sample) than the conventional maceration techniques (72 h, 10 ml/g of dried sample).

摘要

从植物中提取活性化合物是天然产物用于医药、除草或杀虫用途商业开发中最关键的步骤之一。本研究的重点是比较传统浸渍法和加压液体萃取(PLE)技术,以高效地从鱼藤和马来鱼藤的茎和根中提取鱼藤酮。研究了诸如溶剂、温度和压力等实验变量对PLE效率的影响。与常用溶剂95%乙醇(鱼藤酮含量15.0%,w/w)相比,氯仿被确定为一种良好的萃取溶剂(鱼藤酮含量40.6%,w/w)。PLE的最佳条件为50℃和2000磅力/平方英寸。与传统浸渍法(鱼藤酮含量40.6%,w/w)相比,PLE显示出更高的萃取效率(鱼藤酮含量46.1%,w/w)。通过优化方法获得的粗提物中鱼藤酮含量从高到低的顺序分别为鱼藤的根(46.1%,w/w)、茎(9.4%,w/w)和马来鱼藤的茎(5.2%,w/w)。此外,本研究结果表明,与传统浸渍技术(72小时,10毫升/克干样品)相比,PLE消耗的时间和溶剂要少得多(30分钟,3毫升/克干样品)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验