University of Kansas.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1978 Spring;11(1):67-74. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-67.
Effects of serial and concurrent task presentation on skill acquisition, generalization, and maintenance were compared. Two severely retarded females participated. During serial training, items of one response class, tracing, were trained to mastery before those of a second task, vocal imitation. In the concurrent method, training on two different tasks, tracing and vocal imitation, alternated within sessions for fixed periods of time. There were no major differences between the serial and concurrent methods of instruction in the number of steps attained per behavior or in the number of trials required to reach criterion levels of performance. It was found however, that concurrent training resulted in more generalization. Retention results were not consistently related to training method.
分别和同时呈现任务对技能习得、泛化和保持的影响进行了比较。两名严重智障女性参与了研究。在序列训练中,一种反应类别的项目(追踪)在第二个任务(发声模仿)之前被训练到精通。在并发方法中,两种不同任务(追踪和发声模仿)在会话内交替进行固定时间的训练。在达到行为的每一步的数量或达到绩效标准所需的试次数量方面,序列和并发教学方法之间没有明显差异。然而,研究发现,并发训练导致了更多的泛化。保留结果与训练方法没有一致的关系。