Dunlap G, Koegel R L
J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Winter;13(4):619-27. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-619.
This study evaluated the differential effectiveness of two methods of presenting discrimination tasks when teaching autistic children. In a constant task condition, the common method of presenting a single task throughout a session was used. In a varied task condition, the same task was interspersed with a variety of other tasks from the children's clinic curricula. Results showed declining trends in correct responding during the constant task condition, with substantially improved and stable responding during the varied task conditions. In addition, naive observers judged the children to be more enthusiastic, interested, happier, and better behaved during the varied task sessions. These results suggest that "boredom" may be a particularly important variable to control in the treatment of autistic children, and that particular care may be necessary when defining criteria for task acquisition. The results are discussed in relation to the literature on increased responsivity to stimulus novelty and variation.
本研究评估了在教授自闭症儿童时呈现辨别任务的两种方法的不同效果。在固定任务条件下,采用了在整个课程中呈现单一任务的常见方法。在多样化任务条件下,相同的任务穿插了儿童临床课程中的各种其他任务。结果显示,在固定任务条件下正确反应呈下降趋势,而在多样化任务条件下反应有显著改善且保持稳定。此外,外行观察者判断儿童在多样化任务课程中更热情、更感兴趣、更快乐且行为表现更好。这些结果表明,“无聊”可能是治疗自闭症儿童时需要特别控制的一个重要变量,并且在定义任务习得标准时可能需要格外小心。结合关于对刺激新颖性和变化反应性增加的文献对这些结果进行了讨论。