Vignes Tore
Stavanger Hospital Trust, Habilitation Services.
Anal Verbal Behav. 2007;23(1):113-22. doi: 10.1007/BF03393051.
This study is a replication of Sundberg and Sundberg (1990) that compared topography-based verbal behavior with selection-based verbal behavior in terms of acquisition, accuracy, and testing for the emergence of a new verbal relation. Participants were three typical children and three developmentally disabled persons with autism. The study sought to determine which paradigm (topography-based or selection-based) resulted in more rapid acquisition of tacts and intraverbals, which was associated with the fewest errors, and which paradigm resulted in the emergence of the highest number of new verbal relations. The results of the study showed that the six participants performed quite differently from one another. Most importantly, the results from the person with autism contradicted previous findings favoring selection-based verbal behavior over topography-based approaches for teaching verbal behavior to low-functioning individuals.
本研究是对桑德伯格和桑德伯格（1990年）的一项重复研究，该研究在习得、准确性以及对新言语关系出现的测试方面，比较了基于形式的言语行为和基于选择的言语行为。参与者包括三名典型儿童和三名患有自闭症的发育障碍者。该研究旨在确定哪种范式（基于形式或基于选择）能使接触性言语行为和内部言语行为的习得速度更快，哪种范式的错误最少，以及哪种范式能产生最多的新言语关系。研究结果表明，这六名参与者的表现彼此差异很大。最重要的是，自闭症患者的研究结果与之前的研究结果相矛盾，之前的研究结果倾向于在向低功能个体教授言语行为时，基于选择的言语行为优于基于形式的方法。
