• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于大学的激励计划以增加安全带使用:实现具有成本效益的制度化。

A university-based incentive program to increase safety belt use: Toward cost-effective institutionalization.

机构信息

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):215-26. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-215.

DOI:10.1901/jaba.1985.18-215
PMID:16795689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1308012/
Abstract

A cost-effective incentive program to increase safety belt use was implemented by the campus police of a large university. For each of the 3-week intervention periods during three consecutive academic quarters, the 22 campus police officers recorded the license plate numbers of vehicles with drivers wearing a shoulder belt. From these numbers, 10 raffle winners were drawn who received gift certificates donated by community merchants. Faculty and staff increased their belt usage markedly as a result of the "Seatbelt Sweepstakes," whereas students increased their belt use only slightly. A cost-effectiveness analysis indicated that the sweepstakes cost an average of $0.98 per each newly buckled driver. During each sweepstakes intervention, officers' belt usage increased significantly, but diminished to initial baseline levels after the final withdrawal of the program. Surveys of officers' opinions indicated that the police would accept the program demands as a regular task requirement. This result and the fact that program promotion and coordination were eventually taken over by two student organizations suggest that institutionalization of the "Seatbelt Sweepstakes" is feasible.

摘要

一个经济有效的激励计划,以增加安全带的使用,是由一个大学校园警察实施的。在连续三个学术季度的三个 3 周干预期间,22 名校园警察记录了佩戴肩带的司机的车辆牌照号码。从这些数字中,抽取了 10 名抽奖获奖者,他们获得了社区商家捐赠的礼品券。由于“安全带抽奖”,教师和工作人员明显增加了他们的安全带使用,而学生只是略有增加。成本效益分析表明,抽奖活动平均每位新扣紧安全带的司机花费 0.98 美元。在每次抽奖活动中,警察的安全带使用明显增加,但在计划最终退出后,安全带使用又回到了最初的基线水平。对警察意见的调查表明,警察将接受该计划的要求,作为一项常规任务要求。这一结果以及该计划的推广和协调最终由两个学生组织接管的事实表明,“安全带抽奖”的制度化是可行的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0875/1308012/60ec17601df0/jaba00029-0033-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0875/1308012/60ec17601df0/jaba00029-0033-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0875/1308012/60ec17601df0/jaba00029-0033-a.jpg

相似文献

1
A university-based incentive program to increase safety belt use: Toward cost-effective institutionalization.基于大学的激励计划以增加安全带使用:实现具有成本效益的制度化。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):215-26. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-215.
2
A behavioral analysis of incentive prompts for motivating seat belt use.激励提示对促进安全带使用的行为分析。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1982 Fall;15(3):403-13. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-403.
3
Rewarding safety belt usage at an industrial setting: Tests of treatment generality and response maintenance.在工业环境中奖励系安全带的行为:治疗泛化和反应维持的测试。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1983 Summer;16(2):189-202. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1983.16-189.
4
Safety belt education using visual crash images and low-cost incentives.使用视觉碰撞图像和低成本激励措施进行安全带教育。
J Sch Health. 1994 Mar;64(3):103-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1994.tb03269.x.
5
Safety belt use by law enforcement officers on reality television: a missed opportunity for injury prevention?执法人员在真人秀节目中使用安全带:预防伤害的一个错失的机会?
J Trauma. 2006 Oct;61(4):1001-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000236642.02701.e8.
6
Compliance with traffic laws by traffic police officers, non-traffic police officers, and civilian drivers.交通警察、非交通警察和民用驾驶员对交通法规的遵守情况。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(5):446-50. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.834531.
7
Modeling school bus seat belt usage: Nested and mixed logit approaches.校车安全带使用建模:嵌套和混合对数模型方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Mar;51:56-67. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.10.008. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
8
Drive alive: teen seat belt survey program.行车安全:青少年安全带使用调查项目。
West J Emerg Med. 2010 Aug;11(3):279-82.
9
The effects of an intervention campaign to enhance seat belt use on campus.一项旨在提高校园安全带使用率的干预活动的效果。
J Am Coll Health. 1999 May;47(6):277-80. doi: 10.1080/07448489909595659.
10
Police officer perceptions of the impact of Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) programs.警察对危机干预小组(CIT)项目影响的看法。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014 Jul-Aug;37(4):341-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Three-Point Safety Polymeric Belt Webbing versus Four-Point Belt for a Race Car in Frontal Crashes.三点式安全聚合物安全带织带与四点式安全带在赛车正面碰撞中的比较。
Materials (Basel). 2023 Dec 14;16(24):7640. doi: 10.3390/ma16247640.
3
Combining Footwear with Public Health Iconography to Prevent Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infections.
结合鞋类与公共卫生意象以预防土壤传播的蠕虫感染。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Jan 11;96(1):205-213. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0910. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
4
Increasing seat belt use on a college campus: an evaluation of two prompting procedures.大学校园安全带使用情况的增加:两种提示程序的评估
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Spring;42(1):161-4. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-161.
5
"Flash for life": Community-based prompting for safety belt promotion.“闪光一生”:基于社区的安全带推广提示。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Winter;18(4):309-14. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-309.
6
A behavioral science approach to transportation safety.一种用于交通安全的行为科学方法。
Bull N Y Acad Med. 1988 Sep-Oct;64(7):632-61.
7
Promoting law enforcement for child protection: a community analysis.促进儿童保护执法:一项社区分析。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Winter;25(4):885-92. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-885.