在不同的时间表安排下对强化物的偏好：一种行为经济学分析。
Preference for reinforcers under varying schedule arrangements: A behavioral economic analysis.
机构信息
Minda Inc., Adelaide, Australia.
出版信息
J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Winter;27(4):597-606. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-597.
Abstract
The field of behavioral economics combines concepts from economics and operant conditioning to examine the influence of schedules or price on preference for reinforcers. Three case studies are reported in which behavioral economic analyses were used to assess relative preference for reinforcers shown by people with intellectual disabilities when schedule requirements varied. The studies examined (a) preference for different reinforcers, (b) substitutability of reinforcers, and (c) changes in preference as a function of schedule requirements.
摘要
行为经济学领域结合了经济学和操作性条件作用的概念，以研究时间表或价格对强化物偏好的影响。报告了三个案例研究，其中使用行为经济学分析来评估智力障碍者在时间表要求变化时对强化物的相对偏好。这些研究考察了（a）不同强化物的偏好，（b）强化物的可替代性，以及（c）作为时间表要求函数的偏好变化。
相似文献
1
Preference for reinforcers under varying schedule arrangements: A behavioral economic analysis.在不同的时间表安排下对强化物的偏好：一种行为经济学分析。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Winter;27(4):597-606. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-597.
2
Revealed preference between reinforcers used to examine hypotheses about behavioral consistencies.用于检验关于行为一致性假设的强化物之间的显示性偏好。
Behav Modif. 2000 Jul;24(3):411-24. doi: 10.1177/0145445500243007.
3
Emergence of reinforcer preference as a function of schedule requirements and stimulus similarity.强化物偏好作为时间表要求和刺激相似性的函数而出现。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):439-49. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-439.
4
How do reinforcers affect choice? Preference pulses after responses and reinforcers.强化物如何影响选择？反应和强化物后的偏好脉冲。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2017 Jul;108(1):17-38. doi: 10.1002/jeab.260. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
5
An analysis of reinforcer substitutability using object manipulation and self-injury as competing responses.一项使用物体操控和自我伤害作为竞争反应的强化物可替代性分析。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Spring;30(1):21-41. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-21.
6
Concurrent nonindependent fixed-ratio schedules of alcohol self-administration: Effects of schedule size on choice.酒精自我给药的并发非独立固定比率程序：程序大小对选择的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2016 Jul;106(1):75-92. doi: 10.1002/jeab.215. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
7
Economic substitutability of electrical brain stimulation, food, and water.脑电刺激、食物和水的经济替代性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Mar;55(2):133-43. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-133.
8
Assessing reinforcers under progressive schedule requirements.在渐进式时间表要求下评估强化物。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Summer;34(2):145-66. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-145.
9
Pigeons' demand and preference for specific and generalized conditioned reinforcers in a token economy.鸽子在代币经济中对特定和广义条件强化物的需求与偏好。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Nov;104(3):296-314. doi: 10.1002/jeab.181.
10
Preference pulses without reinforcers.无强化物的偏好脉冲。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 May;101(3):317-36. doi: 10.1002/jeab.84. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
引用本文的文献
1
Reinforcer value moderates response magnitude and persistence during extinction: A randomized trial.强化物价值调节消退期间反应幅度和持续性：一项随机试验。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2024 Jul;57(3):615-634. doi: 10.1002/jaba.1088. Epub 2024 Jun 2.
2
Editorial: Retrospections, Prospections and New Paths for Behavioral Science.社论：行为科学的反思、展望与新路径
Behav Anal. 2017 Dec 4;40(2):291-295. doi: 10.1007/s40614-017-0130-9. eCollection 2017 Nov.
3
Editorial: What We Can Afford and What Counts.社论：我们所能承受的与重要之事。
Behav Anal. 2017 Jul 6;40(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s40614-017-0115-8. eCollection 2017 Jun.
4
Children with Autism show Atypical Preference for Non-social Stimuli.自闭症儿童表现出对非社交刺激的异常偏好。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 17;9(1):10355. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46705-8.
5
Systematic assessment of food item preference and reinforcer effectiveness: Enhancements in training laboratory-housed rhesus macaques.食物偏好和强化物有效性的系统评估：圈养恒河猴训练实验室的改进
Behav Processes. 2018 Dec;157:445-452. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
6
Does preference rank predict substitution for the reinforcer for problem behavior? a behavioral economic analysis.偏好等级能否预测问题行为强化物的替代？一项行为经济学分析。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2018 Apr;51(2):276-282. doi: 10.1002/jaba.452. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
7
Using a Progressive Ratio Schedule of Reinforcement as an Assessment Tool to Inform Treatment.使用渐进比率强化程序作为一种评估工具为治疗提供依据。
Behav Anal Pract. 2016 Jan 21;9(3):257-60. doi: 10.1007/s40617-016-0107-2. eCollection 2016 Sep.
8
Preference for fluent versus disfluent work schedules.偏好流畅的工作时间表而非不流畅的工作时间表。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Winter;44(4):847-58. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-847.
9
Consumption and response output as a function of unit price: manipulation of cost and benefit components.消费和反应输出作为单位价格的函数：成本和收益成分的操纵。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Fall;42(3):609-25. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-609.
10
Token reinforcement: a review and analysis.代币强化：综述与分析
J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Mar;91(2):257-86. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.91-257.
本文引用的文献
1
The substitutability of reinforcers.强化物的可替代性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jul;60(1):141-158. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-141.
2
Response deprivation, reinforcement, and economics.反应剥夺、强化与经济学
J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jul;60(1):129-140. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-129.
3
Performances on ratio and interval schedules of reinforcement: Data and theory.比率和间隔强化时间表的表现：数据与理论。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Mar;59(2):245-64. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-245.
4
Behavioral economics.行为经济学。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Nov;42(3):435-52. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-435.
5
Eating and drinking: An economic analysis.饮食：经济分析。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 May;39(3):385-404. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-385.
6
Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior.经济行为分析的概念。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Sep;34(2):219-38. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-219.
7
Demand for food on fixed-ratio schedules as a function of the quality of concurrently available reinforcement.固定比例时间表下对食物的需求取决于同时可获得的强化物的质量。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Mar;27(2):371-80. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-371.
8
On the law of effect.关于效果律。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243-66. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243.
9
Effects of reinforcer rate and reinforcer quality on time allocation: Extensions of matching theory to educational settings.强化率和强化质量对时间分配的影响：匹配理论在教育环境中的扩展。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Fall;25(3):691-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-691.
10
Toward empirical behavior laws. I. positive reinforcement.走向经验性的行为规律。一、正强化
Psychol Rev. 1959 Jul;66(4):219-33. doi: 10.1037/h0040891.
Zotero 插件