Sestini Piersante, Cappiello Vita, Aliani Maria, Martucci Paola, Sena Angelo, Vaghi Adriano, Canessa Piero Aldo, Neri Margherita, Melani Andrea S
Department of Clinical Medicine and Immunological Sciences, Section of Respiratory Diseases, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
J Aerosol Med. 2006 Summer;19(2):127-36. doi: 10.1089/jam.2006.19.127.
Many different inhalers are available for delivering aerosol therapy in respiratory medicine. As a consequence, the prescribing physicians may have some difficulty tailoring the most suitable inhaler to each patient. This multicenter, observational study using a self-administered questionnaire analyzed the characteristics of a large sample of patients (n = 1,305; 55% females; mean age 57.4, with a range of 15-88 years; most suffering from asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]) familiar with several different types of inhalers in relation to their most commonly used delivery device. Data on the inhalation technique for 2,057 observations of 1,126 patients using device-specific checklists and factors associated to misuse were also evaluated. Prevalent usage of newer dry powder inhalers (DPIs) was significantly associated with male sex, higher education, better respiratory function, and prescription from a respiratory physician. Patients using DPIs had received less instruction by health caregivers and were more likely to have read the instruction leaflet than users of metered dose inhalers (MDIs). Under these conditions, inhaler misuse was common and similar for both pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) and DPIs. For both types of inhalers, misuse was significantly and equally associated to increased age, less education, and less instruction by health care personnel. We conclude that many doctors are not familiar with the relevant characteristics of currently available inhalers. The prescription of newer DPIs may be subjected to gender, socio-economic, and instruction bias. The simple change of device from the pMDI to the newer DPIs is not associated with improved inhalation technique.
在呼吸医学中,有许多不同的吸入器可用于进行雾化治疗。因此,开处方的医生在为每个患者选择最合适的吸入器时可能会遇到一些困难。这项多中心观察性研究使用自行填写的问卷,分析了大量熟悉几种不同类型吸入器的患者样本(n = 1305;55%为女性;平均年龄57.4岁,范围为15 - 88岁;大多数患有哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病[COPD])与其最常用给药装置相关的特征。还评估了1126名患者使用特定装置检查表进行的2057次吸入技术观察数据以及与误用相关的因素。新型干粉吸入器(DPI)的普遍使用与男性、高等教育程度、更好的呼吸功能以及呼吸科医生的处方显著相关。使用DPI的患者从医护人员那里获得的指导较少,并且比使用定量吸入器(MDI)的患者更有可能阅读说明书。在这些情况下,吸入器误用很常见,压力定量吸入器(pMDI)和DPI的误用情况相似。对于这两种类型的吸入器,误用都与年龄增加、教育程度较低以及医护人员指导较少显著且同等相关。我们得出结论,许多医生不熟悉目前可用吸入器的相关特征。新型DPI的处方可能存在性别、社会经济和指导方面的偏差。从pMDI简单更换为新型DPI与吸入技术的改善无关。