Pandori Mark W, Lei John, Wong Ernest H, Klausner Jeffrey, Liska Sally
San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA 94102, USA.
BMC Infect Dis. 2006 Jun 24;6:104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-104.
The speed and sensitivity of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) have made it a popular method for the detection of microbiological agents in both research and clinical specimens. For the detection and genotyping of herpes simplex virus (HSV) in clinical specimens, real-time PCR has proven to be faster, more sensitive and safer than earlier methods which included isolation of the virus in cell culture followed by immunofluorescence microscopy. While PCR-based assays for HSV detection posses clear advantages over these earlier techniques, certain aspects of the PCR method remain onerous. The process of extraction and purification of nucleic acid from clinical specimens prior to PCR is particularly cumbersome. Nucleic acid extraction is expensive, time-consuming and provides a step whereby specimens can become contaminated prior to their analysis. Herein, we investigate the necessity of nucleic acid extraction from swab-based clinical specimens for HSV detection by real-time PCR. We find that nucleic acid extraction is unnecessary for specific and sensitive detection of HSV in clinical specimens using real-time PCR.
Prospective (n = 36) and retrospective (n = 21) clinical specimens from various anatomical sites were analyzed for the presence of herpes simplex virus 1 or 2 by real-time PCR using the RealArt HSV 1/2 LC PCR Kit. Specimens were analyzed by PCR both before and following automated nucleic acid extraction. PCR using extracted and unextracted specimens was also compared to cell culture as a means of detecting HSV.
Detection of HSV 1/2 DNA in clinical specimens by real-time PCR did not require that the specimen be subjected to nucleic acid extraction/purification prior to analysis. Each specimen that was detectable by real-time PCR when analyzed in the extracted form was also detectable when analyzed in the unextracted form using the methods herein. The limit of detection of HSV-1 and HSV-2 particles when analyzed in the unextracted form was found to be approximately 17 and 32 virus particles respectively, compared to a sensitivity of 10 copies, for analysis of purified DNA. Omission of the nucleic acid extraction step shortened both the assay time and cost.
Omission of the nucleic acid extraction step prior to real-time PCR for detection of herpes simplex virus resulted in a more rapid and cost-effective assay, with little impact upon the sensitivity of detection.
实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)的速度和灵敏度使其成为一种在研究和临床标本中检测微生物病原体的常用方法。对于临床标本中单纯疱疹病毒(HSV)的检测和基因分型,实时PCR已被证明比早期方法更快、更灵敏且更安全,早期方法包括在细胞培养中分离病毒,随后进行免疫荧光显微镜检查。虽然基于PCR的HSV检测方法比这些早期技术具有明显优势,但PCR方法的某些方面仍然繁琐。在PCR之前从临床标本中提取和纯化核酸 的过程特别麻烦。核酸提取既昂贵又耗时,并且提供了一个步骤,使得标本在分析之前可能被污染。在此我们研究了对于通过实时PCR检测HSV的基于拭子 的临床标本进行核酸提取 的必要性。我们发现,使用实时PCR对临床标本进行HSV的特异性 和灵敏检测时,核酸提取是不必要的。
使用RealArt HSV 1/2 LC PCR试剂盒,通过实时PCR分析来自不同解剖部位的前瞻性(n = 36)和回顾性(n = 21)临床标本中单纯疱疹病毒1型或2型的存在情况。在自动核酸提取之前和之后对标本进行PCR分析。还将使用提取和未提取标本的PCR与作为检测HSV手段的细胞培养进行比较了。
通过实时PCR检测临床标本中的HSV 1/2 DNA,不需要在分析之前对标本进行核酸提取/纯化处理。当以提取形式分析时可通过实时PCR检测到的每个标本,当使用本文方法以未提取形式分析时也可检测到。发现以未提取形式分析时HSV - 1和HSV - 2颗粒的检测限分别约为17和32个病毒颗粒,而分析纯化DNA时的灵敏度为10个拷贝。省略核酸提取步骤缩短了检测时间并降低了成本。
在用于检测单纯疱疹病毒的实时PCR之前省略核酸提取步骤,可使检测方法更快且更具成本效益,对检测灵敏度几乎没有影响