Suppr超能文献

Wiltse腰椎旁正中入路中一条中线皮肤切口与两条外侧切口的比较:一项尸体研究

Comparison between one midline cutaneous incision and two lateral incisions in the lumbar paraspinal approach by Wiltse: a cadaver study.

作者信息

Olivier Eric, Beldame Julien, Ould Slimane Mourad, Defives Thomas, Duparc Fabrice

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Traumatologic and Plastic Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, 76 000, Rouen, France.

出版信息

Surg Radiol Anat. 2006 Oct;28(5):494-7. doi: 10.1007/s00276-006-0123-y. Epub 2006 Jun 24.

Abstract

Wiltse has described in 1968 an intermuscular lumbar approach with two vertical incisions made at 30 mm each on both sides of the midline. Since 1988, Wiltse recommends to practice a single median incision because of aesthetic arguments and because it avoids potential difficulties in case of iterative surgery. In this paper, the goal of authors was to determine the advantages of two lateral incisions, particularly in term of cutaneous vascularization. This cadaveric study concerned ten specimens. Colored latex was injected into the lumbar segmentary arteries before taking a cutaneous flap. We calculated the mean of the number of vessels injected and cut on the midline, then all the 10 mm on both sides. The goal was to establish a cutaneous cartography, and to determine a zone of less vascular sacrifice. The lumbar skin was vascularized by an arteriolar network which spreads out from the midline. At 30 mm from the midline, the number of cut vessels is statistically less than in the others areas (P < 0.05). At this distance, the small arteries are superficial, fine, and the subcutaneous tissue appears poorly vascularized. The two lateral incisions have the advantage compared to a single median incision of being short, and of allowing a direct access to the muscular plan of cleavage without subcutaneous detachment, with a less pressure retraction. We think that an incision at 30 mm from spinous processes is less noxious for the skin because it is located at the border of two vascular territories, which depend of a median network for one, and a lateral network for the other. These incisions generate technical difficulties, however, when the approach is prolonged with the top of L2/L3, when a lateral and/or central canalar decompression is considered, and finally, in the event of iterative surgery.

摘要

威尔茨在1968年描述了一种经肌间入路的腰椎手术方法,即在中线两侧各做两个相距30毫米的垂直切口。自1988年以来,威尔茨建议采用单一正中切口,出于美学考虑,也因为这样可避免再次手术时可能出现的困难。在本文中,作者的目的是确定两个外侧切口的优势,特别是在皮肤血管化方面。这项尸体研究涉及10个标本。在取皮瓣前,将彩色乳胶注入腰段动脉。我们计算了在中线以及两侧各10毫米范围内注入并切断的血管数量的平均值。目的是建立皮肤血管分布图,并确定血管牺牲较少的区域。腰椎皮肤由从中线延伸出的小动脉网络供血。在距中线30毫米处,切断的血管数量在统计学上少于其他区域(P<0.05)。在这个距离,小动脉浅表、细小,皮下组织血管化程度似乎较差。与单一正中切口相比,两个外侧切口的优点是切口短,可直接进入肌间隙平面而无需皮下剥离,牵开压力较小。我们认为,距棘突30毫米处的切口对皮肤的损害较小,因为它位于两个血管区域的边界,一侧依赖正中网络供血,另一侧依赖外侧网络供血。然而,当手术入路延伸至L2/L3椎体上缘、考虑进行外侧和/或中央椎管减压,以及在再次手术时,这些切口会带来技术上的困难。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验