• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Wiltse腰椎旁正中入路中一条中线皮肤切口与两条外侧切口的比较:一项尸体研究

Comparison between one midline cutaneous incision and two lateral incisions in the lumbar paraspinal approach by Wiltse: a cadaver study.

作者信息

Olivier Eric, Beldame Julien, Ould Slimane Mourad, Defives Thomas, Duparc Fabrice

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Traumatologic and Plastic Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, 76 000, Rouen, France.

出版信息

Surg Radiol Anat. 2006 Oct;28(5):494-7. doi: 10.1007/s00276-006-0123-y. Epub 2006 Jun 24.

DOI:10.1007/s00276-006-0123-y
PMID:16799751
Abstract

Wiltse has described in 1968 an intermuscular lumbar approach with two vertical incisions made at 30 mm each on both sides of the midline. Since 1988, Wiltse recommends to practice a single median incision because of aesthetic arguments and because it avoids potential difficulties in case of iterative surgery. In this paper, the goal of authors was to determine the advantages of two lateral incisions, particularly in term of cutaneous vascularization. This cadaveric study concerned ten specimens. Colored latex was injected into the lumbar segmentary arteries before taking a cutaneous flap. We calculated the mean of the number of vessels injected and cut on the midline, then all the 10 mm on both sides. The goal was to establish a cutaneous cartography, and to determine a zone of less vascular sacrifice. The lumbar skin was vascularized by an arteriolar network which spreads out from the midline. At 30 mm from the midline, the number of cut vessels is statistically less than in the others areas (P < 0.05). At this distance, the small arteries are superficial, fine, and the subcutaneous tissue appears poorly vascularized. The two lateral incisions have the advantage compared to a single median incision of being short, and of allowing a direct access to the muscular plan of cleavage without subcutaneous detachment, with a less pressure retraction. We think that an incision at 30 mm from spinous processes is less noxious for the skin because it is located at the border of two vascular territories, which depend of a median network for one, and a lateral network for the other. These incisions generate technical difficulties, however, when the approach is prolonged with the top of L2/L3, when a lateral and/or central canalar decompression is considered, and finally, in the event of iterative surgery.

摘要

威尔茨在1968年描述了一种经肌间入路的腰椎手术方法,即在中线两侧各做两个相距30毫米的垂直切口。自1988年以来,威尔茨建议采用单一正中切口,出于美学考虑,也因为这样可避免再次手术时可能出现的困难。在本文中,作者的目的是确定两个外侧切口的优势,特别是在皮肤血管化方面。这项尸体研究涉及10个标本。在取皮瓣前,将彩色乳胶注入腰段动脉。我们计算了在中线以及两侧各10毫米范围内注入并切断的血管数量的平均值。目的是建立皮肤血管分布图,并确定血管牺牲较少的区域。腰椎皮肤由从中线延伸出的小动脉网络供血。在距中线30毫米处,切断的血管数量在统计学上少于其他区域(P<0.05)。在这个距离,小动脉浅表、细小,皮下组织血管化程度似乎较差。与单一正中切口相比,两个外侧切口的优点是切口短,可直接进入肌间隙平面而无需皮下剥离,牵开压力较小。我们认为,距棘突30毫米处的切口对皮肤的损害较小,因为它位于两个血管区域的边界,一侧依赖正中网络供血,另一侧依赖外侧网络供血。然而,当手术入路延伸至L2/L3椎体上缘、考虑进行外侧和/或中央椎管减压,以及在再次手术时,这些切口会带来技术上的困难。

相似文献

1
Comparison between one midline cutaneous incision and two lateral incisions in the lumbar paraspinal approach by Wiltse: a cadaver study.Wiltse腰椎旁正中入路中一条中线皮肤切口与两条外侧切口的比较:一项尸体研究
Surg Radiol Anat. 2006 Oct;28(5):494-7. doi: 10.1007/s00276-006-0123-y. Epub 2006 Jun 24.
2
The Wiltse paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine revisited: an anatomic study.重新审视腰椎的Wiltse椎旁入路:一项解剖学研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Apr;445:175-80. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000203466.20314.2a.
3
[Case-control study on effects of two approaches on multifidus muscle injuries during lumbar interbody fusion of lumbar vertebrae].[两种方法对腰椎椎间融合术中多裂肌损伤影响的病例对照研究]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2013 Sep;26(9):735-40.
4
Multilevel magnetic resonance imaging analysis of multifidus-longissimus cleavage planes in the lumbar spine and potential clinical applications to Wiltse's paraspinal approach.腰椎多裂肌-最长肌间隙的多层磁共振成像分析及其在 Wiltse 经椎间旁入路中的潜在临床应用。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jul 15;36(16):1263-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f520e8.
5
Anatomical study of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine.腰椎椎旁入路的解剖学研究
Eur Spine J. 2005 May;14(4):366-71. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0802-5. Epub 2004 Nov 19.
6
Single midline incision approach for decompression of greater, lesser and third occipital nerves in migraine surgery.偏头痛手术中采用单一正中切口对粗大、小和第三枕神经进行减压。
BMC Surg. 2022 Jun 17;22(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01675-z.
7
Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs in the lateral position: an anatomic study.侧卧位经腹膜后斜行入路 L2-S1 椎间盘:解剖学研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Nov;21(5):785-93. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.SPINE13564. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
8
A comparison of the Wiltse versus midline approaches in degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine.腰椎退行性疾病中Wiltse入路与中线入路的比较。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Sep;25(3):332-8. doi: 10.3171/2016.2.SPINE151018. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
9
Robot-assisted Sistrunk's operation, total thyroidectomy, and neck dissection via a transaxillary and retroauricular (TARA) approach in papillary carcinoma arising in thyroglossal duct cyst and thyroid gland.经腋后(TARA)入路机器人辅助施行 Sistrunk 手术、甲状腺全切除术和颈淋巴结清扫术治疗甲状舌管囊肿和甲状腺起源的乳头状癌
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(13):4259-61. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2674-y. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
10
The midline posterior elbow incision. An anatomical appraisal.肘部后正中切口。解剖学评估。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 Sep;77(5):696-9.

引用本文的文献

1
TRANSFORAMINAL INTERSOMATIC LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS: COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOGRAFT AND CAGE IN PEEK.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术:自体骨移植与聚醚醚酮椎间融合器的比较
Acta Ortop Bras. 2020 Nov-Dec;28(6):296-302. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220202806238460.
2
How to perform the Wiltse posterolateral spinal approach: Technical note.如何进行Wiltse后外侧脊柱入路:技术说明。
Surg Neurol Int. 2018 Feb 14;9:38. doi: 10.4103/sni.sni_344_17. eCollection 2018.
3
Hydrodissection of Wiltse's Plane to Facilitate Exposure During Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

本文引用的文献

1
The lumbar artery perforator based island flap: anatomical study and case reports.基于腰动脉穿支的岛状皮瓣:解剖学研究及病例报告。
Br J Plast Surg. 1999 Oct;52(7):541-6. doi: 10.1054/bjps.1999.3120.
2
The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine.腰椎旁骶棘肌劈开入路
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1968 Jul;50(5):919-26.
3
New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine.腰椎椎旁入路的新用途及改进
威尔茨平面水分离术以利于微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中的显露
Cureus. 2017 Nov 23;9(11):e1872. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1872.
4
[Trajectory of lumbar and sacral pedicular screws: Comparison between midline versus wiltse approach].[腰椎和骶椎椎弓根螺钉的轨迹:中线入路与Wiltse入路的比较]
Surg Neurol Int. 2017 Oct 24;8(Suppl 2):S18-S24. doi: 10.4103/sni.sni_275_17. eCollection 2017.
5
Magnetic resonance imaging-based anatomical study of the multifidus-longissimus cleavage planes in the lumbar spine.基于磁共振成像的腰椎多裂肌-最长肌劈裂平面的解剖学研究
Am J Transl Res. 2016 Jan 15;8(1):109-16. eCollection 2016.
6
Two different surgery approaches for treatment of thoracolumbar fracture.两种不同的手术方法治疗胸腰椎骨折。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Dec 15;8(12):22425-9. eCollection 2015.
7
CT and MRI Determination of Intermuscular Space within Lumbar Paraspinal Muscles at Different Intervertebral Disc Levels.CT和MRI对不同椎间盘水平腰椎旁肌肉肌间隙的测定
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 12;10(10):e0140315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140315. eCollection 2015.
8
Surgical outcomes of mini-open Wiltse approach and conventional open approach in patients with single-segment thoracolumbar fractures without neurologic injury.单节段无神经损伤胸腰椎骨折患者采用微创Wiltse入路与传统开放入路的手术疗效
J Biomed Res. 2015 Jan;29(1):76-82. doi: 10.7555/JBR.29.20140083. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
9
Clinical application of the paraspinal erector approach for spinal canal decompression in upper lumber burst fractures.椎旁竖脊肌入路在上段腰椎爆裂骨折椎管减压中的临床应用
J Orthop Surg Res. 2014 Nov 13;9:105. doi: 10.1186/s13018-014-0105-4.
10
What is the rate of lumbar adjacent segment disease after percutaneous versus open fusion?经皮融合与开放融合术后腰椎相邻节段疾病的发生率是多少?
Orthop Surg. 2014 May;6(2):118-20. doi: 10.1111/os.12103.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Jun;13(6):696-706.