Heinrich Sina, Schiffmann Holger, Frerichs Alexander, Klockgether-Radke Adelbert, Frerichs Inéz
Centre for Anaesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Intensive Care Med. 2006 Sep;32(9):1392-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0252-0. Epub 2006 Jun 24.
To determine the effects of body and head positions on the spatial distribution of ventilation in nonintubated spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated infants using electrical impedance tomography (EIT).
Prospective study in a neonatal intensive care unit.
Ten spontaneously breathing (gestational age 38 weeks, postnatal age 13 days) and ten mechanically ventilated infants (gestational age 35 weeks, postnatal age 58 days).
Supine and prone postures with different head positions (midline and rotated to the left and right side).
The distribution of ventilation in the chest cross-section was repeatedly determined from EIT data in each body/head position studied. During spontaneous breathing the tidal volumes in the left lung region were reduced in the supine posture with the head turned to the left as well as in the prone posture with the head rotated to either side when compared with the supine posture with the head in the midline position. During mechanical ventilation the tidal volumes in the left lung region were unaffected by the body and head position except for the prone posture combined with the leftward head rotation which reduced them. In both types of ventilation the tidal volumes in the right lung region were unaffected by the change in body/head position.
The results indicate that the spatial distribution of ventilation is influenced by the body and head position in spontaneously breathing infants. Prone posture with the leftward head rotation has the most prominent effect which is detectable even during mechanical ventilation.
使用电阻抗断层成像(EIT)确定身体和头部位置对非插管自主呼吸和机械通气婴儿通气空间分布的影响。
在新生儿重症监护病房进行的前瞻性研究。
10名自主呼吸婴儿(胎龄38周,出生后13天)和10名机械通气婴儿(胎龄35周,出生后58天)。
采用不同头部位置(中线以及向左和向右侧旋转)的仰卧位和俯卧位。
根据研究的每个身体/头部位置的EIT数据,反复确定胸部横截面的通气分布。与头部处于中线位置的仰卧位相比,自主呼吸时,头部转向左侧的仰卧位以及头部向任一侧旋转的俯卧位时,左肺区域的潮气量均减少。机械通气时,除了俯卧位并伴有头部向左旋转会使左肺区域潮气量减少外,身体和头部位置对其没有影响。在两种通气类型中,右肺区域的潮气量均不受身体/头部位置变化的影响。
结果表明,自主呼吸婴儿的通气空间分布受身体和头部位置的影响。头部向左旋转的俯卧位影响最为显著,即使在机械通气期间也可检测到。