Suppr超能文献

“你们为什么不进入郊区?为什么把目标对准我们?”:南非HIV疫苗试验中的信任与不信任

"Why Don't You Go Into Suburbs? Why Are You Targeting Us?": Trust and Mistrust in HIV Vaccine Trials in South Africa.

作者信息

Thabethe Siyabonga, Slack Catherine, Lindegger Graham, Wilkinson Abigail, Wassenaar Douglas, Kerr Philippa, Bekker Linda-Gail, Mngadi Kathy, Newman Peter A

机构信息

1 University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.

2 University of Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Dec;13(5):525-536. doi: 10.1177/1556264618804740.

Abstract

Trust is a key element of high-quality stakeholder relations, which are themselves essential for the success of HIV vaccine trials. Where trust is absent, community stakeholders might not volunteer to become involved in key trial activities, and potential participants might not volunteer for enrollment. We explored site staff and Community Advisory Board (CAB) members' experiences of trust/mistrust among community members and potential participants. We analyzed 10 focus group discussions with site staff and CAB members at two active South African HIV vaccine trial sites. We report on key characteristics perceived to contribute to the trustworthiness of communicators, as well as factors associated with mistrust. Attributes associated with trustworthy communicators included shared racial identity, competence, and independence (not being "captured"). Key foci for mistrust included explanations about site selection, stored samples, vaccination, and Vaccine Induced Sero-Positivity (VISP). Our findings suggest that community members' trust is not necessarily global, in which trials are trusted or not; rather, it appears fairly nuanced and is impacted by various perceived attributes of communicators and the information they provide. We make recommendations for clinical trial site stakeholders invested in building trust and for future research into trust at these sites.

摘要

信任是高质量利益相关者关系的关键要素,而这种关系本身对于HIV疫苗试验的成功至关重要。如果缺乏信任,社区利益相关者可能不会自愿参与关键的试验活动,潜在参与者也可能不会自愿报名参加。我们探讨了现场工作人员和社区咨询委员会(CAB)成员在社区成员和潜在参与者中对信任/不信任的体验。我们分析了在南非两个活跃的HIV疫苗试验现场与现场工作人员和CAB成员进行的10次焦点小组讨论。我们报告了被认为有助于传播者可信度的关键特征,以及与不信任相关的因素。与值得信赖的传播者相关的属性包括相同的种族身份、能力和独立性(不被“俘获”)。不信任的关键焦点包括关于试验地点选择、储存样本、疫苗接种和疫苗诱导血清阳性(VISP)的解释。我们的研究结果表明,社区成员的信任不一定是全局性的,即对试验是否信任;相反,它似乎相当细微,并且受到传播者的各种感知属性及其提供的信息的影响。我们为致力于建立信任的临床试验现场利益相关者以及这些现场未来关于信任的研究提出了建议。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Pandemic preparedness: why humanities and social sciences matter.大流行防范:为什么人文社会科学很重要。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 16;12:1394569. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1394569. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验