对质的不同强化物的偏好。
Preference for qualitatively different reinforcers.
出版信息
J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Nov;16(3):375-80. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-375.
Abstract
Three pigeons were studied under two-key concurrent variable-interval schedules with food as the reinforcer on one key and ectostriatal brain stimulation as the reinforcer on the other. Brain-stimulation parameters were kept constant while the rate of food reinforcement availability was varied. The results showed that qualitatively different reinforcers could be handled in the same theoretical framework that applies when choice is between different rates, immediacies, and amounts of a single reinforcer.
摘要
三只鸽子在两个关键的同时可变间隔程序下进行研究，其中一个关键的强化物是食物，另一个关键的强化物是外纹状体脑刺激。在保持脑刺激参数不变的情况下，改变食物强化可用性的速度。结果表明，在选择不同的强化物的速度、即时性和数量时适用的相同理论框架中，可以处理不同质的强化物。
相似文献
1
Preference for qualitatively different reinforcers.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Nov;16(3):375-80. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-375.
2
Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Jan;75(1):25-42. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-25.
3
Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2017 Sep;108(2):204-222. doi: 10.1002/jeab.269. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
4
Local preference in concurrent schedules: the effects of reinforcer sequences.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Jul;84(1):37-64. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2005.114-04.
5
Concurrent schedules: reinforcer magnitude effects.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 May;79(3):351-65. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2003.79-351.
6
Reinforcer-ratio variation and its effects on rate of adaptation.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Mar;75(2):207-34. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-207.
7
Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 May;77(3):257-71. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-257.
8
Concurrent variable-interval schedule performance: Fixed versus mixed reinforcer durations.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Mar;41(2):169-82. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-169.
9
Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 Jul;80(1):95-129. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2003.80-95.
10
On the joint control of preference by time and reinforcer-ratio variation.
Behav Processes. 2013 May;95:100-12. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
引用本文的文献
1
An introduction to "discrete choice experiments" for behavior analysts.
Behav Processes. 2022 May;198:104628. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104628. Epub 2022 Mar 27.
2
A generalized matching law analysis of cocaine vs. food choice in rhesus monkeys: effects of candidate 'agonist-based' medications on sensitivity to reinforcement.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Jan 1;146:52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
3
Choice, matching, and human behavior: A review of the literature.
Behav Anal. 1983 Spring;6(1):57-76. doi: 10.1007/BF03391874.
4
Choice in quail neonates: the origins of generalized matching.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Nov;94(3):315-26. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-315.
5
Cocaine is low on the value ladder of rats: possible evidence for resilience to addiction.
PLoS One. 2010 Jul 28;5(7):e11592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011592.
6
Demand equations for qualitatively different foods under fixed-ratio schedules: a comparison of three data conversions.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Nov;92(3):305-26. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.92-305.
7
Concurrent schedules of positive and negative reinforcement: differential-impact and differential-outcomes hypotheses.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Jul;90(1):1-22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.90-1.
8
A model for residence time in concurrent variable interval performance.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Jan;87(1):121-41. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.01-06.
9
Concurrent schedules: Quantifying the aversiveness of noise.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):37-55. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-37.
10
Self-control and impulsiveness in children and adults: Effects of food preferences.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Jul;64(1):33-46. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-33.
本文引用的文献
1
Concurrent schedules of response-independent reinforcement: duration of a reinforcing stimulus.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Mar;15(2):211-4. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-211.
2
On the law of effect.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243-66. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243.
3
Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):887-95. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-887.
4
Choice as time allocation.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):861-74. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-861.
5
Choice and delay of reinforcement.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Jan;10(1):67-74. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-67.
6
Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6(2):299-300. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-299.
7
On some determinants of choice in pigeons.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jan;6(1):53-9. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-53.
8
Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4(3):267-72. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267.
9
Effects of reinforcement magnitude on choice and rate of responding.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Sep;10(5):417-24. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-417.
10
Effects of delayed reinforcement in a concurrent situation.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 Nov;8(6):439-44. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-439.
Zotero 插件