J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Nov;24(3):377-81. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-377.
Four rhesus monkeys were tested for preferences within the wavelength and line-tilt dimensions. In the case of wavelength, the response panel was back-illuminated by light of one of the following wavelengths, presented in a random manner: 470, 525, 580, and 635 nm. Similarly, the line-tilt dimension was studied, by presenting a 5 cm by 0.3 cm black bar tilted at 0, 30, 60, or 90 degrees. No preferences were found within this latter dimension; in contrast, marked wavelength preferences existed, the order of preference being 470 (most preferred), 525, 580, and 635 nm (least preferred). These response preferences were resistant to behavioral manipulation; the number of responses to blue and to red in extinction was about equal when red was used as the training stimulus, but vastly different following training on blue. These results indicate that such response preferences must be taken into account in the design of a wide variety of experiments.
四只恒河猴在波长和线倾斜维度内进行了偏好测试。在波长的情况下,响应面板由以下波长之一的光反向照明,以随机方式呈现:470、525、580 和 635nm。同样,通过呈现倾斜 0、30、60 或 90 度的 5 厘米乘 0.3 厘米的黑色条,研究了线倾斜维度。在这个后者维度中没有发现偏好;相比之下,存在明显的波长偏好,偏好顺序为 470(最受欢迎)、525、580 和 635nm(最不受欢迎)。这些反应偏好不受行为操纵的影响;当红色作为训练刺激时,在消光中对蓝色和红色的反应次数大致相等,但在蓝色训练后则大不相同。这些结果表明,在设计各种实验时必须考虑到这种反应偏好。