J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Jan;29(1):27-36. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-27.
In a series of three experiments the effects of variation in grain duration on automaintenance were evaluated. In the first experiment, key illumination was followed by grain only when pigeons did not peck the key. Each subject was exposed to 2-, 4-, and 8-second feeder durations in blocks of 10 sessions. Subjects pecked on a high percentage of trials at all feeder durations. The mean peck latency was shorter in the 8-second condition than in the two other conditions in five of six subjects. The conditional probability of pecking given successive keylight-grain pairings did not increase as the number of pairings increased. The second experiment was identical to the first, except that key pecking had no scheduled consequence. Under these conditions, all three subjects showed substantial responding. The recorded measures showed no systematic relationship to feeder duration in this study. In the third experiment, two different stimuli were followed by feeder presentations of either identical (2- or 8-second) or different (2- and 8-second) durations within each session. Subjects tended to respond sooner and with a higher overall rate in the presence of the stimulus associated with the longer feeder duration only when different feeder durations were presented within the same session. This result was confirmed by direct observation of the pigeons. The results of these experiments suggest that the effects of varying grain duration may be small, compared to the effects of varying other variables. The results also suggest that the location as well as the frequency of pecking may be an important measure in the analysis of factors controlling the pigeon's key peck.
在一系列的三个实验中,评估了谷物持续时间变化对自动维持的影响。在第一个实验中,只有当鸽子不啄键时,才会跟随钥匙亮起的是谷物。每个被试在 10 个实验块中暴露于 2、4 和 8 秒的喂食器持续时间。在所有喂食器持续时间中,被试的啄食率都很高。在六个被试中的五个中,8 秒条件下的平均啄潜伏期比其他两个条件短。在相继的键-谷物配对中,啄的条件概率没有随着配对次数的增加而增加。第二个实验与第一个实验相同,只是钥匙啄没有预定的结果。在这些条件下,所有三个被试都表现出大量的反应。在这项研究中,记录的测量值与喂食器持续时间没有系统关系。在第三个实验中,两种不同的刺激之后,在每个会话中呈现相同(2 或 8 秒)或不同(2 和 8 秒)持续时间的喂食器。当在同一个会话中呈现不同的喂食器持续时间时,被试在与较长喂食器持续时间相关的刺激存在时,往往会更早地做出反应,并且整体反应率更高。这一结果通过直接观察鸽子得到了证实。这些实验的结果表明,与其他变量相比,改变谷物持续时间的效果可能较小。结果还表明,啄击的位置和频率可能是分析控制鸽子关键啄击的因素的重要衡量标准。