Doss Amanda Jensen, Weisz John R
Department of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Jun;74(3):416-25. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.416.
Despite widespread speculation that syndrome co-occurrence undermines treatment outcomes, this hypothesis has not been fully examined within clinical care settings. To address this gap, the authors investigated the relation between syndrome co-occurrence and outcome among 325 clinically referred youths. For every syndrome, higher initial severity was predictive of greater treatment gains and higher posttreatment symptom levels; contrary to speculation in the literature, co-occurrence effects were rare and modest in size, accounting for 0.6% of outcome variance on average. The results suggest that co-occurrence, though common in youth clinical care, is not an obstacle to treatment success in most cases. In addition to its substantive findings, the study illustrates how a dimensional approach can be used to shed new light on co-occurrence in clinical care.
尽管有广泛的猜测认为综合征共现会损害治疗效果,但这一假设在临床护理环境中尚未得到充分检验。为了填补这一空白,作者调查了325名临床转诊青少年中综合征共现与治疗结果之间的关系。对于每一种综合征,初始严重程度越高,治疗收益越大,治疗后症状水平越高;与文献中的猜测相反,共现效应很少见且规模较小,平均占结果方差的0.6%。结果表明,共现虽然在青少年临床护理中很常见,但在大多数情况下并不是治疗成功的障碍。除了其实质性发现外,该研究还说明了如何使用维度方法为临床护理中的共现现象提供新的见解。