Kane Michael J, Poole Bradley J, Tuholski Stephen W, Engle Randall W
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Greensboro, NC 27402-6170, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jul;32(4):749-77. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.749.
The executive attention theory of working memory capacity (WMC) proposes that measures of WMC broadly predict higher order cognitive abilities because they tap important and general attention capabilities (R. W. Engle & M. J. Kane, 2004). Previous research demonstrated WMC-related differences in attention tasks that required restraint of habitual responses or constraint of conscious focus. To further specify the executive attention construct, the present experiments sought boundary conditions of the WMC-attention relation. Three experiments correlated individual differences in WMC, as measured by complex span tasks, and executive control of visual search. In feature-absence search, conjunction search, and spatial configuration search, WMC was unrelated to search slopes, although they were large and reliably measured. Even in a search task designed to require the volitional movement of attention (J. M. Wolfe, G. A. Alvarez, & T. S. Horowitz, 2000), WMC was irrelevant to performance. Thus, WMC is not associated with all demanding or controlled attention processes, which poses problems for some general theories of WMC.
工作记忆容量(WMC)的执行注意理论提出,WMC的测量方法广泛地预测高阶认知能力,因为它们挖掘了重要且通用的注意能力(R.W.恩格尔和M.J.凯恩,2004年)。先前的研究表明,在需要抑制习惯性反应或限制有意识注意力的注意任务中,存在与WMC相关的差异。为了进一步明确执行注意结构,本实验探寻了WMC与注意关系的边界条件。三个实验将通过复杂广度任务测量的WMC个体差异与视觉搜索的执行控制进行了关联。在特征缺失搜索、联合搜索和空间构型搜索中,WMC与搜索斜率无关,尽管搜索斜率很大且测量可靠。即使在一项旨在要求注意力进行意志性转移的搜索任务中(J.M.沃尔夫、G.A.阿尔瓦雷斯和T.S.霍洛维茨,2000年),WMC与表现也无关。因此,WMC并非与所有高要求或受控制的注意过程相关联,这给一些WMC的通用理论带来了问题。