Swanson H L, Berninger V W
School of Education, University of California at Riverside 92521, USA.
J Exp Child Psychol. 1996 Nov;63(2):358-85. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1996.0054.
The purpose of this research is to address (a) whether individual differences in working memory (WM) and writing are related to a general or process-specific system, (b) whether WM tasks operate independently of phonological short-term memory (STM) on measures of writing and reading, and (c) whether working memory predicts variance in writing beyond that predicted by reading alone. The present study correlated several WM and phonological STM measures with writing and reading measures. The study showed among the memory measures that a four-factor model reflecting phonological STM, verbal WM span, executive processing, and visual-spatial WM span best fit the multivariate data set. Working memory was correlated significantly with a number of writing measures, particularly those related to text generation. WM measures contributed unique variance to writing that was independent of reading skill, and STM measures best predicted transcription processes and reading recognition, whereas WM measures best predicted text generation and reading comprehension. Both verbal and visual-spatial working memory measures predicted reading comprehension, whereas only WM measures that reflect executive processing significantly predicted writing. In general, the results suggest that individual differences in children's writing reflect a specific capacity system, whereas reading comprehension draws upon a multiple capacity system.
(a)工作记忆(WM)和写作方面的个体差异是否与一个通用系统或特定过程系统相关;(b)在写作和阅读测试中,WM任务是否独立于语音短期记忆(STM)进行操作;以及(c)工作记忆能否预测写作中的变异,且超出仅由阅读所预测的范围。本研究将若干WM和语音STM测试与写作和阅读测试进行了关联。研究表明,在记忆测试中,一个反映语音STM、言语WM广度、执行加工和视觉空间WM广度的四因素模型最能拟合多变量数据集。工作记忆与多项写作测试显著相关,尤其是那些与文本生成相关的测试。WM测试为写作贡献了独立于阅读技能的独特变异,STM测试最能预测抄写过程和阅读识别,而WM测试最能预测文本生成和阅读理解。言语和视觉空间工作记忆测试均能预测阅读理解,而只有反映执行加工的WM测试能显著预测写作。总体而言,结果表明儿童写作中的个体差异反映了一个特定的能力系统,而阅读理解则依赖于一个多能力系统。