Bennett Russell L
Department of Health Policy & Management, School of Public Health, College of Public Service, Jackson State University, Jackson Medical Mall, 350 W. Woodrow Wilson Ave., Suite 2301-A, Jackson, Mississippi, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2006 Mar;3(1):67-75. doi: 10.3390/ijerph2006030008.
The possibility of a terrorist attack employing the use of chemical or biological weapons of mass destruction (WMD) on American soil is no longer an empty threat, it has become a reality. A WMD is defined as any weapon with the capacity to inflict death and destruction on such a massive scale that its very presence in the hands of hostile forces is a grievous threat. Events of the past few years including the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993, the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City in 1995 and the use of planes as guided missiles directed into the Pentagon and New York's Twin Towers in 2001 (9/11) and the tragic incidents involving twentythree people who were infected and five who died as a result of contact with anthrax-laced mail in the Fall of 2001, have well established that the United States can be attacked by both domestic and international terrorists without warning or provocation. In light of these actions, hospitals have been working vigorously to ensure that they would be "ready" in the event of another terrorist attack to provide appropriate medical care to victims. However, according to a recent United States General Accounting Office (GAO) nationwide survey, our nation's hospitals still are not prepared to manage mass causalities resulting from chemical or biological WMD. Therefore, there is a clear need for information about current hospital preparedness in order to provide a foundation for systematic planning and broader discussions about relative cost, probable effectiveness, environmental impact and overall societal priorities. Hence, the aim of this research was to examine the current preparedness of hospitals in the State of Mississippi to manage victims of terrorist attacks involving chemical or biological WMD. All acute care hospitals in the State were selected for inclusion in this study. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were utilized for data collection and analysis. Six hypotheses were tested. Using a questionnaire survey, the availability of functional preparedness plans, specific preparedness education/training, decontamination facilities, surge capacity, pharmaceutical supplies, and laboratory diagnostic capabilities of hospitals were examined. The findings revealed that a majority (89.2%) of hospitals in the State of Mississippi have documented preparedness plans, provided specific preparedness education/training (89.2%), have dedicated facilities for decontamination (75.7%), and pharmaceutical plans and supplies (56.8%) for the treatment of victims in the event of a disaster involving chemical or biological WMD. However, over half (59.5%) of the hospitals could not increase surge capacity (supplies, equipment, staff, patient beds, etc.) and lack appropriate laboratory diagnostic services (91.9%) capable of analyzing and identifying WMD. In general, hospitals in the State of Mississippi, like a number of hospitals throughout the United States, are still not adequately prepared to manage victims of terrorist attacks involving chemical or biological WMD which consequently may result in the loss of hundreds or even thousands of lives. Therefore, hospitals continue to require substantial resources at the local, State, and national levels in order to be "truly" prepared.
恐怖分子在美国本土使用化学或生物大规模杀伤性武器发动袭击的可能性已不再是无稽之谈,而是成为了现实。大规模杀伤性武器被定义为任何能够造成大规模死亡和破坏的武器,其一旦落入敌对势力手中便构成严重威胁。过去几年发生的一系列事件,包括1993年世贸中心爆炸案、1995年俄克拉何马城联邦大楼爆炸案、2001年(9·11事件)飞机被用作制导导弹撞向五角大楼和纽约双子塔,以及2001年秋季发生的涉及23人感染炭疽热信件且5人死亡的悲剧事件,充分证明美国可能会遭受国内外恐怖分子毫无预警或挑衅的袭击。鉴于这些事件,医院一直在积极努力确保在再次发生恐怖袭击时能够“做好准备”,为受害者提供适当的医疗救治。然而,根据美国政府问责局(GAO)最近的一项全国性调查,美国的医院仍未做好应对化学或生物大规模杀伤性武器造成的大量伤亡的准备。因此,显然需要了解当前医院的准备情况,以便为系统规划以及关于相关成本、可能的效果、环境影响和整体社会优先事项的更广泛讨论奠定基础。因此,本研究的目的是调查密西西比州医院应对涉及化学或生物大规模杀伤性武器的恐怖袭击受害者的当前准备情况。该州所有的急症护理医院都被纳入本研究。数据收集和分析采用了定量和定性方法。测试了六个假设。通过问卷调查,考察了医院功能准备计划的可用性、特定的准备教育/培训、去污设施、应急能力、药品供应以及实验室诊断能力。研究结果显示,密西西比州大多数(89.2%)医院都有书面的准备计划,提供了特定的准备教育/培训(89.2%),设有专门的去污设施(75.7%),并制定了药品计划和储备(56.8%),以应对涉及化学或生物大规模杀伤性武器的灾难中的受害者。然而,超过一半(59.5%)的医院无法增加应急能力(物资、设备、人员、病床等),并且缺乏能够分析和识别大规模杀伤性武器的适当实验室诊断服务(91.9%)。总体而言,密西西比州的医院与美国其他许多医院一样,仍未充分做好应对涉及化学或生物大规模杀伤性武器的恐怖袭击受害者的准备,这可能导致数百甚至数千人丧生。因此,医院在地方、州和国家层面仍需要大量资源才能“真正”做好准备。